<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accessibility and the new Kindle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/05/07/accessibility-and-the-new-kindle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/accessibility-and-the-new-kindle/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Martinengo</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/accessibility-and-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-1053665</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Martinengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21567#comment-1053665</guid>
		<description>As much as I might criticize the approach of some disability advocacy groups at times, I do have to say that colleges bring a lot of accessibility woes upon themselves.

Why do prestigious universities agree to pilot a device that leaves out a number of their students? Why don&#039;t they use their leverage to push for greater accessibility?

The ADA makes it clear that putting up a new building without providing wheel-chair access is against the law. Why is it so difficult to imagine extending that commitment to accessibility to access to information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I might criticize the approach of some disability advocacy groups at times, I do have to say that colleges bring a lot of accessibility woes upon themselves.</p>
<p>Why do prestigious universities agree to pilot a device that leaves out a number of their students? Why don&#8217;t they use their leverage to push for greater accessibility?</p>
<p>The ADA makes it clear that putting up a new building without providing wheel-chair access is against the law. Why is it so difficult to imagine extending that commitment to accessibility to access to information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GJN</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/accessibility-and-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-1053208</link>
		<dc:creator>GJN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21567#comment-1053208</guid>
		<description>This is the sort of thing that drives people far far right...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the sort of thing that drives people far far right&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece, Publisher</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/accessibility-and-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-1053196</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece, Publisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21567#comment-1053196</guid>
		<description>Complaining about the Kindle when it&#039;s better than standard textbooks seems backwards. Maybe it&#039;s not perfect but shouldn&#039;t we celebrate improvements rather than castigate those making them?

Rob Preece
BooksForABuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complaining about the Kindle when it&#8217;s better than standard textbooks seems backwards. Maybe it&#8217;s not perfect but shouldn&#8217;t we celebrate improvements rather than castigate those making them?</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
BooksForABuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wallcraft</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/paul-biba/accessibility-and-the-new-kindle/comment-page-1/#comment-1053172</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wallcraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21567#comment-1053172</guid>
		<description>They are also using exactly the same 6 font sizes on the DX as on the Kindle 2.  With the larger screen, and the landscape mode, Amazon could easily offer a largest font size 2-3x bigger than this.  Landscape helps because the largest practical font size depends on how many characters fit on one line.

PDFs are not reflowable on the DX, but custom PDFs can have whatever font size you want.  On the other hand, text to speech does not work with PDFs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are also using exactly the same 6 font sizes on the DX as on the Kindle 2.  With the larger screen, and the landscape mode, Amazon could easily offer a largest font size 2-3x bigger than this.  Landscape helps because the largest practical font size depends on how many characters fit on one line.</p>
<p>PDFs are not reflowable on the DX, but custom PDFs can have whatever font size you want.  On the other hand, text to speech does not work with PDFs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/364 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-14 18:13:51 -->
