<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment Spam Poetry: A million spammers will produce Shakespeare..or will they?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/04/29/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/comment-page-1/#comment-1149165</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/29/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/#comment-1149165</guid>
		<description>Quite a funny post.  We thought about doing a legal services blog. and launched it in a genuine attempt to offer some free advice got bombarded by spam and shut it down.

I would be interested to find out how much manual intervention is required with the software you use as this is something we would like to try again.

Regards
Will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite a funny post.  We thought about doing a legal services blog. and launched it in a genuine attempt to offer some free advice got bombarded by spam and shut it down.</p>
<p>I would be interested to find out how much manual intervention is required with the software you use as this is something we would like to try again.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/comment-page-1/#comment-1047445</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/29/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/#comment-1047445</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iranian irritating Kenny Pearce&quot; is the new spam creativity for today.  Michael, I find akismet to be pretty effective, but the hardest part is for new commenters. Akismet will mistake a lot of new commenters for spam. If I had to start from scratch, I would forbid comments altogether unless a person registers. this does not really solve the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iranian irritating Kenny Pearce&#8221; is the new spam creativity for today.  Michael, I find akismet to be pretty effective, but the hardest part is for new commenters. Akismet will mistake a lot of new commenters for spam. If I had to start from scratch, I would forbid comments altogether unless a person registers. this does not really solve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/comment-page-1/#comment-1047005</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/29/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/#comment-1047005</guid>
		<description>As one who often goes through TeleRead&#039;s spam to check for false positives, I have to say I&#039;ve seen some of the same sorts of poetry in auto-generated spam. 

I have to wonder how &lt;I&gt;anyone&lt;/I&gt; could run a blog in this day and age without protection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As one who often goes through TeleRead&#8217;s spam to check for false positives, I have to say I&#8217;ve seen some of the same sorts of poetry in auto-generated spam. </p>
<p>I have to wonder how <i>anyone</i> could run a blog in this day and age without protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pastore</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/comment-page-1/#comment-1046905</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pastore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/29/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/#comment-1046905</guid>
		<description>A very funny post: thank you, Robert. And it led me to your entertaining blog, with many good stories.

To shift to a more serious gear, I have two questions for you:

1) Even with the Akismet spam protection, is it a very time-intensive effort to keep the spam comments out?
 
2) How you manage snarky, rude, &quot;ad hominem&quot;,  and borderline &quot;nasty&quot; posts? ... Are they filtered out in some way?

Thanks ... MP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very funny post: thank you, Robert. And it led me to your entertaining blog, with many good stories.</p>
<p>To shift to a more serious gear, I have two questions for you:</p>
<p>1) Even with the Akismet spam protection, is it a very time-intensive effort to keep the spam comments out?</p>
<p>2) How you manage snarky, rude, &#8220;ad hominem&#8221;,  and borderline &#8220;nasty&#8221; posts? &#8230; Are they filtered out in some way?</p>
<p>Thanks &#8230; MP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/comment-page-1/#comment-1046774</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/29/comment-spam-poetry-a-million-spammers-will-produce-shakespeareor-will-they/#comment-1046774</guid>
		<description>What a fun post, Robert; thanks. As for the TeleBlog, I suspect our killed-spam count by now is probably well in the millions. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fun post, Robert; thanks. As for the TeleBlog, I suspect our killed-spam count by now is probably well in the millions. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 355/380 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 11:59:48 -->
