<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Qualcomm&#8217;s color-capable display tech beat out E Ink for e-book screens?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/04/28/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Tallent</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1046450</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Tallent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1046450</guid>
		<description>Wow, sorry about the mis-attribution abhi. Looks like I am making lots of apologies today.... Better proofreading next time, I promise.

- Joshua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, sorry about the mis-attribution abhi. Looks like I am making lots of apologies today&#8230;. Better proofreading next time, I promise.</p>
<p>- Joshua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1045998</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1045998</guid>
		<description>Fixed, Abhi, as long as you got there first. Thanks! David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed, Abhi, as long as you got there first. Thanks! David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abhi</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1045914</link>
		<dc:creator>abhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1045914</guid>
		<description>hey - it&#039;s not Mike Cane, it&#039;s abhi for ireaderreview. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey &#8211; it&#8217;s not Mike Cane, it&#8217;s abhi for ireaderreview. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1045809</link>
		<dc:creator>Windwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1045809</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Joshua. I appreciate your addressing this so promptly and graciously, and I certainly understand how easily such things occur.

Cheers,
Windwalker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Joshua. I appreciate your addressing this so promptly and graciously, and I certainly understand how easily such things occur.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Windwalker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Tallent of eBookArchitects.com</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1045805</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Tallent of eBookArchitects.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1045805</guid>
		<description>Steve,

You are completely correct. I have revised my post above. Please accept my sincerest apologies.

- Joshua</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>You are completely correct. I have revised my post above. Please accept my sincerest apologies.</p>
<p>- Joshua</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windwalker</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1045751</link>
		<dc:creator>Windwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1045751</guid>
		<description>Hi Joshua, I don&#039;t mind being called &quot;wrong&quot; and I don&#039;t mind being misquoted, but I&#039;ll admit it gets my Irish up a wee bit when someone misquotes me and then calls me wrong for what he said I said. Fortunately I am a lenient judge, and your sentence is nothing more than to go back and read my post and then make the appropriate correction in yours. To help you get started, here is what I said about the possibility of a color screen for the Kindle at any time before 2011:

&quot;2009 Kindle-Compatible TouchTablet
    * Although bloggers have been buzzing for months about a large-form Kindle (first in 2008, and then, when that didn’t happen, in 2009), most of this buzz has been self-feeding, and I admit that I’ll be happily surprised, but still surprised, if there is a large-form e-Ink Kindle display in 2009. Maybe he needed to be more reticent about events closer to launch date, but Wilcox didn’t even mention 2009. He was very specific in mentioning 2010 and 2011.
    * Much more likely: a large-form, backlit, energy-intensive, high-end Kindle-compatible iPod TouchTablet with a price point in the $599-$699 range.&quot;

Cheers,
Windwalker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joshua, I don&#8217;t mind being called &#8220;wrong&#8221; and I don&#8217;t mind being misquoted, but I&#8217;ll admit it gets my Irish up a wee bit when someone misquotes me and then calls me wrong for what he said I said. Fortunately I am a lenient judge, and your sentence is nothing more than to go back and read my post and then make the appropriate correction in yours. To help you get started, here is what I said about the possibility of a color screen for the Kindle at any time before 2011:</p>
<p>&#8220;2009 Kindle-Compatible TouchTablet<br />
    * Although bloggers have been buzzing for months about a large-form Kindle (first in 2008, and then, when that didn’t happen, in 2009), most of this buzz has been self-feeding, and I admit that I’ll be happily surprised, but still surprised, if there is a large-form e-Ink Kindle display in 2009. Maybe he needed to be more reticent about events closer to launch date, but Wilcox didn’t even mention 2009. He was very specific in mentioning 2010 and 2011.<br />
    * Much more likely: a large-form, backlit, energy-intensive, high-end Kindle-compatible iPod TouchTablet with a price point in the $599-$699 range.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Windwalker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-book-device-screens-could-qualcomms-color-display-usurp-e-ink/comment-page-1/#comment-1045732</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=21013#comment-1045732</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information on the Mirasol display.

Technology Review has a very recent article about yet another contender for “astounding display of the future”. Below are excerpts from the article titled &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22545/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;“A New E-Paper Competitor”&lt;/A&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt; A new display technology could make electronic paper look more like the real thing. Conventional ink on paper has a much higher brightness and black-and-white color contrast than electronic paper. The new display, made by researchers at the University of Cincinnati, in Ohio, is designed to match the brilliance and contrast of paper. … The pixels also switch between black and white within one millisecond, making the technology suitable for video. …

 So far, Heikenfeld and his colleagues have made rigid black-and-white displays that reflect 55 percent of ambient light--far more than any electronic-paper products currently on the market. … The pixels are as small as 100 micrometers wide, giving the display a resolution of 300 dots per inch. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information on the Mirasol display.</p>
<p>Technology Review has a very recent article about yet another contender for “astounding display of the future”. Below are excerpts from the article titled <a HREF="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22545/" rel="nofollow">“A New E-Paper Competitor”</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p> A new display technology could make electronic paper look more like the real thing. Conventional ink on paper has a much higher brightness and black-and-white color contrast than electronic paper. The new display, made by researchers at the University of Cincinnati, in Ohio, is designed to match the brilliance and contrast of paper. … The pixels also switch between black and white within one millisecond, making the technology suitable for video. …</p>
<p> So far, Heikenfeld and his colleagues have made rigid black-and-white displays that reflect 55 percent of ambient light&#8211;far more than any electronic-paper products currently on the market. … The pixels are as small as 100 micrometers wide, giving the display a resolution of 300 dots per inch. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 393/421 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 06:59:30 -->
