<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snapped up by Amazon, Lexcycle claims it won&#8217;t change app or &#8216;user experience&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/04/27/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/kindle/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/kindle/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1045467</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/27/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/#comment-1045467</guid>
		<description>Perhaps The Onion will soon do one of their celebrated news reports on Amazon. The topic? A small company on the leading edge of book distribution that Amazon is NOT buying.

They could interview a (fake) CEO lamenting that, despite all his efforts, he hasn&#039;t been able to get Amazon to return his calls.&quot;I just can&#039;t understand it,&quot; he says, &quot;we&#039;re doing everything right and yet they won&#039;t call. And when I tried to talk to Bezos at a recent conference, he turned around and ran away.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps The Onion will soon do one of their celebrated news reports on Amazon. The topic? A small company on the leading edge of book distribution that Amazon is NOT buying.</p>
<p>They could interview a (fake) CEO lamenting that, despite all his efforts, he hasn&#8217;t been able to get Amazon to return his calls.&#8221;I just can&#8217;t understand it,&#8221; he says, &#8220;we&#8217;re doing everything right and yet they won&#8217;t call. And when I tried to talk to Bezos at a recent conference, he turned around and ran away.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Meadows</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/kindle/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1045429</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Meadows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/27/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/#comment-1045429</guid>
		<description>They have &quot;embraced and extended&quot; the Mobipocket format to where it&#039;s incompatible with original Mobi DRM, and won&#039;t let people read Mobi DRM books on the Kindle—or on the iPhone, as they have (apparently) prevented Mobi from releasing a reader for that device.

Up to this point, it appears that all they&#039;ve wanted to do was keep Mobi—used by many DRM-using competitor e-book stores—off of the iPhone, and put their non-Mobi-reading Kindle app on iPhone instead.

Wonder if Stanza could now incorporate Mobipocket DRM into its reader with impunity, given that Amazon owns both it and them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have &#8220;embraced and extended&#8221; the Mobipocket format to where it&#8217;s incompatible with original Mobi DRM, and won&#8217;t let people read Mobi DRM books on the Kindle—or on the iPhone, as they have (apparently) prevented Mobi from releasing a reader for that device.</p>
<p>Up to this point, it appears that all they&#8217;ve wanted to do was keep Mobi—used by many DRM-using competitor e-book stores—off of the iPhone, and put their non-Mobi-reading Kindle app on iPhone instead.</p>
<p>Wonder if Stanza could now incorporate Mobipocket DRM into its reader with impunity, given that Amazon owns both it and them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/kindle/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-1045428</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/04/27/snapped-up-by-amazon-lexcyle-claims-it-wont-change-app-or-user-experience/#comment-1045428</guid>
		<description>Is Amazon likely to start selling its books in anything other than its existing format?  Two formats?  I doubt it.  But Amazon always wants to find ways of selling to more people.

So it seems sensible that their acquisition of Lexcycle could be to speed up the process of developing apps for non-Kindle devices, to expand the range of devices that can read Amazon&#039;s e-books.  As they have already embraced the iPhone, and Lexcycle has made clear that they wanted to develop Stanza for other devices (meaning more customers), aiding that process would make sense.  As I&#039;ve said before, not everyone in the world owns an iPhone.

The alternative would be that Amazon wants to quash non-Kindle access to their store.  This doesn&#039;t seem to make sense, as it means they are limiting their potential customer base.

The third possibility, that Amazon wants to quash ePub, just seems ludicrous.  The genie&#039;s already out of that bottle.  But if future Stanza apps support AZW and not ePub (or just not support it as well as AZW), that would track with Amazon thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Amazon likely to start selling its books in anything other than its existing format?  Two formats?  I doubt it.  But Amazon always wants to find ways of selling to more people.</p>
<p>So it seems sensible that their acquisition of Lexcycle could be to speed up the process of developing apps for non-Kindle devices, to expand the range of devices that can read Amazon&#8217;s e-books.  As they have already embraced the iPhone, and Lexcycle has made clear that they wanted to develop Stanza for other devices (meaning more customers), aiding that process would make sense.  As I&#8217;ve said before, not everyone in the world owns an iPhone.</p>
<p>The alternative would be that Amazon wants to quash non-Kindle access to their store.  This doesn&#8217;t seem to make sense, as it means they are limiting their potential customer base.</p>
<p>The third possibility, that Amazon wants to quash ePub, just seems ludicrous.  The genie&#8217;s already out of that bottle.  But if future Stanza apps support AZW and not ePub (or just not support it as well as AZW), that would track with Amazon thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 317/345 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 12:35:45 -->
