<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright law and the digital library &#8211; compatible?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/04/23/copyright-law-and-the-digital-library-compatible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/copyright-law-and-the-digital-library-compatible/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece, Publisher</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/library/copyright-law-and-the-digital-library-compatible/comment-page-1/#comment-1042647</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece, Publisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/?p=20765#comment-1042647</guid>
		<description>Interesting and thoughtful. Not sure I agree with all of it, though.

Academics have found an alternate funding mechanism. They hit up the government for grants or pretend to teach (the skillsets for teaching and for research are not identical). In contract, researchers working for business don&#039;t expect to get their materials for free and certainly aren&#039;t willing to offer what they develop freely. Which is the more accurate model of the future? I suspect, the answer is a combination.

Assuming that everything will be free and that alternate funding mechanisms will exist for all digital content seems a huge and unwarranted extrapolation. 

Rob Preece
Publisher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and thoughtful. Not sure I agree with all of it, though.</p>
<p>Academics have found an alternate funding mechanism. They hit up the government for grants or pretend to teach (the skillsets for teaching and for research are not identical). In contract, researchers working for business don&#8217;t expect to get their materials for free and certainly aren&#8217;t willing to offer what they develop freely. Which is the more accurate model of the future? I suspect, the answer is a combination.</p>
<p>Assuming that everything will be free and that alternate funding mechanisms will exist for all digital content seems a huge and unwarranted extrapolation. </p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/304 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 04:59:25 -->
