<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Growing kids&#8217; minds&#8212;and BS detectors: Will N.Y.&#8217;s Scroogish guv get in the way? Plus a TeleRead angle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2009/02/16/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-1013139</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/16/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/#comment-1013139</guid>
		<description>Robbie: Thanks very much for your perspective, even if we disagree.

&quot;New York’s top 1 percent of earners paid more than 36 percent of the state’s total income tax in 2008.” 

As well they should--given the vast differences in income between them and the rest of the state. Also see:

http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm

Hey, keep posting. As long as people are civil, which you definitely are, I encourage people to speak up whether they agree with Paul or me or not! Paul, by the way, is probably FAR less populist than I am. He&#039;s even a retired corporate lawyer, adding to fun!

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robbie: Thanks very much for your perspective, even if we disagree.</p>
<p>&#8220;New York’s top 1 percent of earners paid more than 36 percent of the state’s total income tax in 2008.” </p>
<p>As well they should&#8211;given the vast differences in income between them and the rest of the state. Also see:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm</a></p>
<p>Hey, keep posting. As long as people are civil, which you definitely are, I encourage people to speak up whether they agree with Paul or me or not! Paul, by the way, is probably FAR less populist than I am. He&#8217;s even a retired corporate lawyer, adding to fun!</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-1013041</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/16/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/#comment-1013041</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your candid thoughts, Rich.

Actually, I &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; offered to pay for content for New York and other states, through a well-stocked national digital library system supported by taxes.

That&#039;s much or most of what TeleRead is about.

As for the means through which New York and others can pay, a fairer tax structure at both the state and federal levels would go a long way. The tax issue and library-service-level issue are very much intertwined.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your candid thoughts, Rich.</p>
<p>Actually, I <em>have</em> offered to pay for content for New York and other states, through a well-stocked national digital library system supported by taxes.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s much or most of what TeleRead is about.</p>
<p>As for the means through which New York and others can pay, a fairer tax structure at both the state and federal levels would go a long way. The tax issue and library-service-level issue are very much intertwined.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Adin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-1013035</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Adin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/16/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/#comment-1013035</guid>
		<description>David, I appreciate the push to keep librarians and to promote reading. The importance of reading and literacy cannot be overstated.

However, as a New York resident who pays some of the highest taxes in the country and whose dysfunctional government has created a $16 billion budget crisis, I think it is unfair to castigate our governor. Somehow our budget has to be balanced and unlike any of the advocacy groups who want to preserve their funding, he has at least offered concrete proposals that share the pain. I&#039;m not suggesting I agree with his choices; rather, I am saying that it is easy to say do not cut my favorite projects and not offer anything concrete to solve the problem. The health care industry wants no cuts; education wants no cuts; labor wants no cuts -- nobody wants to give up anything from their own fiefdom.

I would also add this. I do not know if you are a New York resident, but I suspect not. As a non-New Yorker it is easy for you to criticize and say don&#039;t cut librarians or teachers or book buying or whatever. Instead, how about stepping up to the plate and saying that you think keeping librarians is important enough in New York that you will fund the cost for 1 school librarian and challenge others to do the same? Can&#039;t afford to do so? Well, guess what: neither can I and neither can most other New Yorkers in these times.

Again, I do not support all of the governor&#039;s suggestions but I really dislike when people become part of the problem rather than part of the solution, which is all too common today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I appreciate the push to keep librarians and to promote reading. The importance of reading and literacy cannot be overstated.</p>
<p>However, as a New York resident who pays some of the highest taxes in the country and whose dysfunctional government has created a $16 billion budget crisis, I think it is unfair to castigate our governor. Somehow our budget has to be balanced and unlike any of the advocacy groups who want to preserve their funding, he has at least offered concrete proposals that share the pain. I&#8217;m not suggesting I agree with his choices; rather, I am saying that it is easy to say do not cut my favorite projects and not offer anything concrete to solve the problem. The health care industry wants no cuts; education wants no cuts; labor wants no cuts &#8212; nobody wants to give up anything from their own fiefdom.</p>
<p>I would also add this. I do not know if you are a New York resident, but I suspect not. As a non-New Yorker it is easy for you to criticize and say don&#8217;t cut librarians or teachers or book buying or whatever. Instead, how about stepping up to the plate and saying that you think keeping librarians is important enough in New York that you will fund the cost for 1 school librarian and challenge others to do the same? Can&#8217;t afford to do so? Well, guess what: neither can I and neither can most other New Yorkers in these times.</p>
<p>Again, I do not support all of the governor&#8217;s suggestions but I really dislike when people become part of the problem rather than part of the solution, which is all too common today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobbieClarken</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/comment-page-1/#comment-1013022</link>
		<dc:creator>RobbieClarken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/2009/02/16/growing-kids-minds-and-bs-detectors-will-nys-scroogish-guv-get-in-the-way-plus-a-teleread-angle/#comment-1013022</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

I enjoy reading Teleread but I really wish you wouldn&#039;t go off-topic with populist statements like &quot;Nice job, Guv! Dumb down future voters. With luck they won’t notice how New York instead could be making millionaires and billionaires bear their share of the tax burden.&quot; From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2RP4oHF5YeU&amp;refer=home&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this Bloomberg.com article&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;New York’s top 1 percent of earners paid more than 36 percent of the state’s total income tax in 2008.&quot; So it seems the millionaires and billionaires you are so keen to punish merely for being wealthy are paying way more than &quot;their share&quot; of the taxes (unless you think these people consume 30 times more in public services than the rest of the population).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>I enjoy reading Teleread but I really wish you wouldn&#8217;t go off-topic with populist statements like &#8220;Nice job, Guv! Dumb down future voters. With luck they won’t notice how New York instead could be making millionaires and billionaires bear their share of the tax burden.&#8221; From <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a2RP4oHF5YeU&amp;refer=home" rel="nofollow">this Bloomberg.com article</a>: &#8220;New York’s top 1 percent of earners paid more than 36 percent of the state’s total income tax in 2008.&#8221; So it seems the millionaires and billionaires you are so keen to punish merely for being wealthy are paying way more than &#8220;their share&#8221; of the taxes (unless you think these people consume 30 times more in public services than the rest of the population).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/363 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 17:41:23 -->
