<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the current ScrollMotion isn&#8217;t the best e-reader for enjoying novels on your iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/12/25/why-the-current-scrollmotion-isnt-the-best-e-reader-for-enjoying-novels-on-your-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-the-current-scrollmotion-isnt-the-best-e-reader-for-enjoying-novels-on-your-iphone/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-the-current-scrollmotion-isnt-the-best-e-reader-for-enjoying-novels-on-your-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-991548</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 13:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/12/25/why-the-current-scrollmotion-isnt-the-best-e-reader-for-enjoying-novels-on-your-iphone/#comment-991548</guid>
		<description>Interesting point, RJH. But when I owned an OLPC machine, I used FBReader to help me immerse myself in novels. That way I could see full screens of text without interruption. A quick roll of a mouse wheel advanced me a page. Some might not like the mouse, but it worked for me. You may need to make adjustments in one of the menus so that a quick wheel roll advances you a full page.

Significantly, just about all those netbooks, including the linux ones, can run FBReader. Too bad FBReader can&#039;t read books infested with DRM, but that has its positives as well, LOL.

For commercial books on XT notebooks, Mobipocket and eReader would be interesting possibilities since they, too, can work with the wheels of USB mice.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting point, RJH. But when I owned an OLPC machine, I used FBReader to help me immerse myself in novels. That way I could see full screens of text without interruption. A quick roll of a mouse wheel advanced me a page. Some might not like the mouse, but it worked for me. You may need to make adjustments in one of the menus so that a quick wheel roll advances you a full page.</p>
<p>Significantly, just about all those netbooks, including the linux ones, can run FBReader. Too bad FBReader can&#8217;t read books infested with DRM, but that has its positives as well, LOL.</p>
<p>For commercial books on XT notebooks, Mobipocket and eReader would be interesting possibilities since they, too, can work with the wheels of USB mice.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rjh</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-the-current-scrollmotion-isnt-the-best-e-reader-for-enjoying-novels-on-your-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-991479</link>
		<dc:creator>rjh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/12/25/why-the-current-scrollmotion-isnt-the-best-e-reader-for-enjoying-novels-on-your-iphone/#comment-991479</guid>
		<description>Cognitive load is an interesting point - it helps explain why (even though it is not the same as reading fiction) web browsing is such a distracting experience.

And it also is a factor that people who recommend a laptop or netbook as a cost-effective alternative to dedicated ereaders should consider. I&#039;ve used these and tabletPCs and find they are just too distracting to use for immersive reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cognitive load is an interesting point &#8211; it helps explain why (even though it is not the same as reading fiction) web browsing is such a distracting experience.</p>
<p>And it also is a factor that people who recommend a laptop or netbook as a cost-effective alternative to dedicated ereaders should consider. I&#8217;ve used these and tabletPCs and find they are just too distracting to use for immersive reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/322 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 13:07:27 -->
