<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia&#8217;s quick updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/11/10/wikipedias-quick-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/wikipedias-quick-updates/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Udsen</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/wikipedias-quick-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-951088</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Udsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/10/wikipedias-quick-updates/#comment-951088</guid>
		<description>No and thats a posible big big problem with ebooks, sometimes and thats especially for political non fictions the errors are the really importent part. 

Your already seing it with newspapers and especially teletext system where stories can simply vanish without a trace and corrections are made to even old stories without telling anyone it&#039;s happening.

Wikipedia is extremely honest and mothodic about their revisions(they have to be to gain credibility), that you probably cant expect from a major publisher who already have the needed credibility. Especially when it comes to softer non fiction(like autobiographies who is really a kind of fiction).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No and thats a posible big big problem with ebooks, sometimes and thats especially for political non fictions the errors are the really importent part. </p>
<p>Your already seing it with newspapers and especially teletext system where stories can simply vanish without a trace and corrections are made to even old stories without telling anyone it&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p>Wikipedia is extremely honest and mothodic about their revisions(they have to be to gain credibility), that you probably cant expect from a major publisher who already have the needed credibility. Especially when it comes to softer non fiction(like autobiographies who is really a kind of fiction).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 279/303 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-09 11:37:13 -->
