<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TeleRead vision vs. Google book settlement: Bring the e-books HOME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/11/04/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garson O'Toole</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/comment-page-1/#comment-948400</link>
		<dc:creator>Garson O'Toole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/04/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/#comment-948400</guid>
		<description>Forcing an individual to travel to a library to access an electronic resource by sitting at a local computer terminal is absurd. But it is happening today as Jeff Scott indicates above. When I wanted to access the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.jstor.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;JSTOR&lt;/A&gt; archives I was not able to use the database remotely from my home computer. Nor was I able to use a local public library branch. Instead I was required to drive to a regional University library. The parking at the library is based on a permit that must be purchased.

The database I wished to access was created by a non-profit organization with the help of philanthropies like the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Here is a description:&lt;blockquote&gt;Today, the JSTOR archives include scholarship published in over one thousand of the highest-quality academic journals across the humanities, social sciences, and sciences, as well as monographs and other materials valuable for academic work.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Many of the publishers are non-profits. Much of the research was supported with tax-dollars. Some of the digitized material is old enough to be in the public domain. Why is this information locked up? Why is access limited in such an irrational manner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forcing an individual to travel to a library to access an electronic resource by sitting at a local computer terminal is absurd. But it is happening today as Jeff Scott indicates above. When I wanted to access the <a HREF="http://www.jstor.org/" rel="nofollow">JSTOR</a> archives I was not able to use the database remotely from my home computer. Nor was I able to use a local public library branch. Instead I was required to drive to a regional University library. The parking at the library is based on a permit that must be purchased.</p>
<p>The database I wished to access was created by a non-profit organization with the help of philanthropies like the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Here is a description:<br />
<blockquote>Today, the JSTOR archives include scholarship published in over one thousand of the highest-quality academic journals across the humanities, social sciences, and sciences, as well as monographs and other materials valuable for academic work.</p></blockquote>
<p>Many of the publishers are non-profits. Much of the research was supported with tax-dollars. Some of the digitized material is old enough to be in the public domain. Why is this information locked up? Why is access limited in such an irrational manner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/comment-page-1/#comment-948375</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/04/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/#comment-948375</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Jeff. Let&#039;s hope that policymakers understand the nuances here. We&#039;re really talking about horrible discrimination against the poor in many casess. 

As I recall, the time limit for computer access at my local library is one hour. Imagine if you&#039;re a kid doing homework, especially if you&#039;re trying to read a whole e-book. I realize that not all library systems are &lt;em&gt;this&lt;/em&gt; horrible. Still, home access is the way to go as one option---I want there to be generous library access, too! And I want these services available to the middle class as well, at least within reason. Otherwise public libraries will be like urban schools.

Publishers should view librarians as friends who can help grow the book market (yep, I know: dream on, in many cases).  And of course they could benefit in other ways. For example, there should be provisions for fair compensation for writers and publishers. We&#039;re talking about tax money and a public-private solution, not just a Google one alone. What&#039;s more, I want other info providers involved rather than merely Google and friends.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Jeff. Let&#8217;s hope that policymakers understand the nuances here. We&#8217;re really talking about horrible discrimination against the poor in many casess. </p>
<p>As I recall, the time limit for computer access at my local library is one hour. Imagine if you&#8217;re a kid doing homework, especially if you&#8217;re trying to read a whole e-book. I realize that not all library systems are <em>this</em> horrible. Still, home access is the way to go as one option&#8212;I want there to be generous library access, too! And I want these services available to the middle class as well, at least within reason. Otherwise public libraries will be like urban schools.</p>
<p>Publishers should view librarians as friends who can help grow the book market (yep, I know: dream on, in many cases).  And of course they could benefit in other ways. For example, there should be provisions for fair compensation for writers and publishers. We&#8217;re talking about tax money and a public-private solution, not just a Google one alone. What&#8217;s more, I want other info providers involved rather than merely Google and friends.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/comment-page-1/#comment-948335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 22:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/11/04/teleread-vision-vs-google-book-settlement-bring-the-e-books-home/#comment-948335</guid>
		<description>The one terminal for libraries stinks. However, it is a pretty standard academic library or database vendor practice. The way this is set up is that you will only be able to view these e-books is in a library and they probably won&#039;t be downloadable. It&#039;s counterinuitive to how e-books work and more in line with how academic research works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one terminal for libraries stinks. However, it is a pretty standard academic library or database vendor practice. The way this is set up is that you will only be able to view these e-books is in a library and they probably won&#8217;t be downloadable. It&#8217;s counterinuitive to how e-books work and more in line with how academic research works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 317/343 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 09:43:03 -->
