<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PW e-book blog deletion still unexplained: Info-biz ramifications in the Google library debate and elsewhere?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/07/13/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:44:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-849035</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/13/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/#comment-849035</guid>
		<description>But HG, if Google does it for free, it can more easily impose conditions that shackle the books. 

I will say in fairness to Google that we&#039;re getting into major questions of national priorities. Why isn&#039;t the money available for the libraries to undertake the arrangements I&#039;ve suggested? 

Google&#039;s digitizing the books with certain conditions imposed is better than no one doing it, but, really, the money ought to be there.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But HG, if Google does it for free, it can more easily impose conditions that shackle the books. </p>
<p>I will say in fairness to Google that we&#8217;re getting into major questions of national priorities. Why isn&#8217;t the money available for the libraries to undertake the arrangements I&#8217;ve suggested? </p>
<p>Google&#8217;s digitizing the books with certain conditions imposed is better than no one doing it, but, really, the money ought to be there.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeavyG</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-849017</link>
		<dc:creator>HeavyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 03:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/13/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/#comment-849017</guid>
		<description>Contractors get paid, however, isn&#039;t Google funding these massive scanning efforts? I think libraries are just offering convenient access to their collections. Google could just buy copies of all these books but that seems like such a waste of time and money when they can instead just access existing collections.

It&#039;s not as if whatever books they scan are no longer available to anyone else via other existing copies be they paper or digital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contractors get paid, however, isn&#8217;t Google funding these massive scanning efforts? I think libraries are just offering convenient access to their collections. Google could just buy copies of all these books but that seems like such a waste of time and money when they can instead just access existing collections.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not as if whatever books they scan are no longer available to anyone else via other existing copies be they paper or digital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-848981</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 02:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/13/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/#comment-848981</guid>
		<description>Hi, HeavyG. It&#039;s the deals with libraries and the massive scanning operation that matter here. Google is the boss. Why is Google, rather than a group of libraries, be in charge here? Google instead should be a contractor. For First Amendment reasons, I love the idea of private alternatives outside the library system, but it&#039;s a bit too much turning over so much to Google. Just the way I see things. Thanks for your comments. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, HeavyG. It&#8217;s the deals with libraries and the massive scanning operation that matter here. Google is the boss. Why is Google, rather than a group of libraries, be in charge here? Google instead should be a contractor. For First Amendment reasons, I love the idea of private alternatives outside the library system, but it&#8217;s a bit too much turning over so much to Google. Just the way I see things. Thanks for your comments. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeavyG</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-848957</link>
		<dc:creator>HeavyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/07/13/pw-e-book-blog-deletion-still-unexplained-and-that-has-info-biz-ramifications-in-the-google-library-debate-and-elsewhere/#comment-848957</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;Just the same, it still scares me that Google, even with stellar leadership, controls so much of our cultural heritage as expressed in ones and zeros.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

How does Google control our cultural heritage? They are scanning books. Anyone else is also free to scan books. How does Googles&#039;s possession of scans of books control much of anything?

Google has a search engine - arguably the largest and most widely used but there are over 100 other search engines many of which give much better targeted results. Anyone is free to create/develop a search engine.

I must be missing something here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Just the same, it still scares me that Google, even with stellar leadership, controls so much of our cultural heritage as expressed in ones and zeros.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>How does Google control our cultural heritage? They are scanning books. Anyone else is also free to scan books. How does Googles&#8217;s possession of scans of books control much of anything?</p>
<p>Google has a search engine &#8211; arguably the largest and most widely used but there are over 100 other search engines many of which give much better targeted results. Anyone is free to create/develop a search engine.</p>
<p>I must be missing something here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/360 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 18:00:55 -->
