<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-books vs. paperbacks vs. hardbacks: Is this guy a snob toward softcovers, even though he reads E?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liviu</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/comment-page-1/#comment-766052</link>
		<dc:creator>Liviu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/#comment-766052</guid>
		<description>I completely detest and avoid as much as possible mmpb because the print is small, many times it tends to be done close to the spine so you have to stretch the book...

 HC&#039;s are nice but sometimes clunky, though durable true. In many ways my favorite format is the oft-criticized tpb, since it&#039;s big enough but lighter and less clunkier than the hc. Sure, it&#039;s less durable, but that&#039;s a matter of taking care of your books

 So for me e-books are less than replacing a particular print format, but about value and convenience. 

 mSo price and availability are very important factors, and while charging close to frontlist prices for new e-books makes some sense, once the print book price drops either by release in another format or by large amounts hitting Amazon used books, it also makes sense lowering the e-book price to keep about 20% under the lowest print (including shipping) alternative. 

 If a book is 4$ used on Amazon (1c + 3.99 sh), I would not pay more than 5$ for an e-book version if I really want the book now, or more than 2.50$ if I can wait a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely detest and avoid as much as possible mmpb because the print is small, many times it tends to be done close to the spine so you have to stretch the book&#8230;</p>
<p> HC&#8217;s are nice but sometimes clunky, though durable true. In many ways my favorite format is the oft-criticized tpb, since it&#8217;s big enough but lighter and less clunkier than the hc. Sure, it&#8217;s less durable, but that&#8217;s a matter of taking care of your books</p>
<p> So for me e-books are less than replacing a particular print format, but about value and convenience. </p>
<p> mSo price and availability are very important factors, and while charging close to frontlist prices for new e-books makes some sense, once the print book price drops either by release in another format or by large amounts hitting Amazon used books, it also makes sense lowering the e-book price to keep about 20% under the lowest print (including shipping) alternative. </p>
<p> If a book is 4$ used on Amazon (1c + 3.99 sh), I would not pay more than 5$ for an e-book version if I really want the book now, or more than 2.50$ if I can wait a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/comment-page-1/#comment-766044</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/#comment-766044</guid>
		<description>Best-seller&#039;s list at Fictionwise, I meant to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best-seller&#8217;s list at Fictionwise, I meant to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Preece</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/comment-page-1/#comment-766043</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Preece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/#comment-766043</guid>
		<description>Actually, I consider not being able to donate eBooks to the library as an advantage. Buy eBooks cheap and donate the money you save to the library. It&#039;ll be worth more to them than the quarter or so they charge for used paperbacks. And it&#039;ll give them the money they need to actually buy books--giving authors (and publishers) a bit of much needed income.

Rob Preece
Publisher, www.BooksForABuck.com

By the way, David, I credit your mention of A Really Bad Hair Day for bumping it from 12th place to 10th place in the Fantasy Best-Seller&#039;s list. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I consider not being able to donate eBooks to the library as an advantage. Buy eBooks cheap and donate the money you save to the library. It&#8217;ll be worth more to them than the quarter or so they charge for used paperbacks. And it&#8217;ll give them the money they need to actually buy books&#8211;giving authors (and publishers) a bit of much needed income.</p>
<p>Rob Preece<br />
Publisher, <a href="http://www.BooksForABuck.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BooksForABuck.com</a></p>
<p>By the way, David, I credit your mention of A Really Bad Hair Day for bumping it from 12th place to 10th place in the Fantasy Best-Seller&#8217;s list. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/comment-page-1/#comment-765998</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/#comment-765998</guid>
		<description>Damien &amp; Richard...

D: That&#039;s a great answer from an E perspective, even if I respectfully disagree with you about soft covers. Actually, more than a few say e-books will be the new paperbacks. Thanks for adding us to your RSS list, and if you want, I can even arrange for you to appear in the main part of the TeleBlog when the spirit moves you. E-mail me at drNOSPAMteleread.com if you&#039;re interested. For now, the very best of luck with your novel!

R: Excellent point about library donations. That is one negative of E as it now exists. I still want to do that long piece on new biz models for libraries; maybe there can be &lt;em&gt;other&lt;/em&gt; ways of donating. On another topic, yes, it&#039;s interesting that Damien has company in his heartfelt rejection of paperbacks. I encourage other TeleBlog community members to speak up, however they feel.

Thanks,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damien &#038; Richard&#8230;</p>
<p>D: That&#8217;s a great answer from an E perspective, even if I respectfully disagree with you about soft covers. Actually, more than a few say e-books will be the new paperbacks. Thanks for adding us to your RSS list, and if you want, I can even arrange for you to appear in the main part of the TeleBlog when the spirit moves you. E-mail me at drNOSPAMteleread.com if you&#8217;re interested. For now, the very best of luck with your novel!</p>
<p>R: Excellent point about library donations. That is one negative of E as it now exists. I still want to do that long piece on new biz models for libraries; maybe there can be <em>other</em> ways of donating. On another topic, yes, it&#8217;s interesting that Damien has company in his heartfelt rejection of paperbacks. I encourage other TeleBlog community members to speak up, however they feel.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien G. Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/comment-page-1/#comment-765982</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien G. Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/#comment-765982</guid>
		<description>Exactly how has Walter been able to “barely touch a paperback in months”—just because he hasn’t found anything worth reading in them, or because he’s immediately rushed out to buy hardback editions?

None of the above. I&#039;ve been reading fewer paperbacks because I&#039;ve been reading more e-books, in turn because the iPhone IS a great e-reader. If people are going to start reading e-books, they are going to stop reading something else. there is only so much time in the world. PBacks seem like the loser to me.

Thanks for linking. Nice blob, I&#039;ll RSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly how has Walter been able to “barely touch a paperback in months”—just because he hasn’t found anything worth reading in them, or because he’s immediately rushed out to buy hardback editions?</p>
<p>None of the above. I&#8217;ve been reading fewer paperbacks because I&#8217;ve been reading more e-books, in turn because the iPhone IS a great e-reader. If people are going to start reading e-books, they are going to stop reading something else. there is only so much time in the world. PBacks seem like the loser to me.</p>
<p>Thanks for linking. Nice blob, I&#8217;ll RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Adin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/comment-page-1/#comment-765962</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Adin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/16/e-books-vs-paperbacks-vs-hardbacks-is-this-guy-a-snob-toward-softcovers-even-though-he-reads-e/#comment-765962</guid>
		<description>I, too, think it is the paperback that has the most to lose from the e-book. Now that I have a Sony Reader, I only buy/read two types of books: hardcover and e-book. I buy the hardcover version of books that I want to keep in my library or give as gifts; I consider e-books to be disposable, like paperbacks. When I was buying paperbacks, after I read them i donated them to the local library (I was always very careful with them so that 95% of the time after I read a paperback it still looked brand new -- no broken spine, ripped pages, etc.) Unfortunately, it is more difficult to do that with e-books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, think it is the paperback that has the most to lose from the e-book. Now that I have a Sony Reader, I only buy/read two types of books: hardcover and e-book. I buy the hardcover version of books that I want to keep in my library or give as gifts; I consider e-books to be disposable, like paperbacks. When I was buying paperbacks, after I read them i donated them to the local library (I was always very careful with them so that 95% of the time after I read a paperback it still looked brand new &#8212; no broken spine, ripped pages, etc.) Unfortunately, it is more difficult to do that with e-books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 379/407 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 17:34:50 -->
