<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Novels, Agony Literature and Literary Fakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/04/09/bad-novels-agony-literature-and-literary-fakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/bad-novels-agony-literature-and-literary-fakes/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Jermey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/bad-novels-agony-literature-and-literary-fakes/comment-page-1/#comment-759307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Jermey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/09/bad-novels-agony-literature-and-literary-fakes/#comment-759307</guid>
		<description>Let me go further: I&#039;ve now read some of the Amazon reviews, and this is a wonderful example of how apprently rational people can disagree so completely that you would not recognise they are even talking about the same book. I wouldn&#039;t like to be stuck in a lift with some of the people who enjoyed the book, but their views are legitimate and if they were entertained by it then that&#039;s all an author can legitimately hope for.

The marketing trick, of course, is to find a way to focus on these nutjobs -- sorry, differently-inspired people -- without handing out thousands of free copies to people like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me go further: I&#8217;ve now read some of the Amazon reviews, and this is a wonderful example of how apprently rational people can disagree so completely that you would not recognise they are even talking about the same book. I wouldn&#8217;t like to be stuck in a lift with some of the people who enjoyed the book, but their views are legitimate and if they were entertained by it then that&#8217;s all an author can legitimately hope for.</p>
<p>The marketing trick, of course, is to find a way to focus on these nutjobs &#8212; sorry, differently-inspired people &#8212; without handing out thousands of free copies to people like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Jermey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/bad-novels-agony-literature-and-literary-fakes/comment-page-1/#comment-759300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Jermey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/04/09/bad-novels-agony-literature-and-literary-fakes/#comment-759300</guid>
		<description>I had a friend who was unfailingly positive about everything he did. We went to see one of the worst movies ever made (the cartoon version of Lord of the Rings) and I came out stunned. &quot;Well,&quot; he said, &quot;I liked the music.&quot; I could never work out whether he was actually living in a state of bliss or one of total denial.

So I suspect that there are people who, having put in the time to read or start reading an awful book, can bring themselves to sincerely believe it is a good one. Somehow it meets their needs. This is one reason why attempts to come up with &#039;objective&#039; standards for judging fiction are just daft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a friend who was unfailingly positive about everything he did. We went to see one of the worst movies ever made (the cartoon version of Lord of the Rings) and I came out stunned. &#8220;Well,&#8221; he said, &#8220;I liked the music.&#8221; I could never work out whether he was actually living in a state of bliss or one of total denial.</p>
<p>So I suspect that there are people who, having put in the time to read or start reading an awful book, can bring themselves to sincerely believe it is a good one. Somehow it meets their needs. This is one reason why attempts to come up with &#8216;objective&#8217; standards for judging fiction are just daft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/322 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 01:32:04 -->
