<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DRM, the Kindle and the Blind &#8211; from a session at the O&#8217;Reilly conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/02/11/drm-the-kindle-and-the-blind-from-a-session-at-the-oreilly-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/drm-the-kindle-and-the-blind-from-a-session-at-the-oreilly-conference/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Martinengo</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/drm-the-kindle-and-the-blind-from-a-session-at-the-oreilly-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-713664</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Martinengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/11/drm-the-kindle-and-the-blind-from-a-session-at-the-oreilly-conference/#comment-713664</guid>
		<description>For more on this topic, check out:

The Soundproof Book: Exploration of Rights conflict and Access to Commercial EBooks for People with Disabilities
http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/informationaldocs/soundproof/soundproof.htm

-and-
The Next Textbook? Finding—or Creating—Alternative Instructional Materials for College Students
http://www.accessiblecontent.com/online/v1n3/index.php?view=textbook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more on this topic, check out:</p>
<p>The Soundproof Book: Exploration of Rights conflict and Access to Commercial EBooks for People with Disabilities<br />
<a href="http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/informationaldocs/soundproof/soundproof.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.idpf.org/doc_library/informationaldocs/soundproof/soundproof.htm</a></p>
<p>-and-<br />
The Next Textbook? Finding—or Creating—Alternative Instructional Materials for College Students<br />
<a href="http://www.accessiblecontent.com/online/v1n3/index.php?view=textbook" rel="nofollow">http://www.accessiblecontent.com/online/v1n3/index.php?view=textbook</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lester</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/drm-the-kindle-and-the-blind-from-a-session-at-the-oreilly-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-713409</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/11/drm-the-kindle-and-the-blind-from-a-session-at-the-oreilly-conference/#comment-713409</guid>
		<description>DRM adds in two pain points for using Screen Readers, such as Jaws.  The first is that DRM usually locks you into a specific application which may or may not play well with the screen readers, since good support for the Screen Readers takes a bit of work to get right (it took Acrobat 2 versions - 3 years, for instance).  The second is that since APIs for Screen Readers are generally available and to be useful the application needs to provide the full text of what you are reading, those APIs make for interesting attack points for people looking to remove the DRM from text.  So the more paranoid publishers prefer the permission in the DRM to disallow access to the screen reading APIs (application permitting of course).


Hardware devices (such as the Kindle) would need to have the accessibility built in, or would need be programmable enough to have it provided later (XO, N800, etc).  Given that the Kindle is a closed platform, I wouldn&#039;t expect to see this happening any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DRM adds in two pain points for using Screen Readers, such as Jaws.  The first is that DRM usually locks you into a specific application which may or may not play well with the screen readers, since good support for the Screen Readers takes a bit of work to get right (it took Acrobat 2 versions &#8211; 3 years, for instance).  The second is that since APIs for Screen Readers are generally available and to be useful the application needs to provide the full text of what you are reading, those APIs make for interesting attack points for people looking to remove the DRM from text.  So the more paranoid publishers prefer the permission in the DRM to disallow access to the screen reading APIs (application permitting of course).</p>
<p>Hardware devices (such as the Kindle) would need to have the accessibility built in, or would need be programmable enough to have it provided later (XO, N800, etc).  Given that the Kindle is a closed platform, I wouldn&#8217;t expect to see this happening any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 298/324 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 10:25:08 -->
