<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Steve Jobs isn&#8217;t entirely wrong about the woes of books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2008/02/02/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-706136</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/02/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/#comment-706136</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Here’s one little tidbit I found in his summary of a Dutch study: Men used to read more than women, but this has changed. Why?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think if you will run a quick search you will find this isn&#039;t really a &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;reading&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; issue. In the US about 58% of the college enrollees are females. Men are dropping out at higher rates in high school, fewer of them are enrolling in college, and fewer of those who enroll are graduating.

There is a lot of debate about what is going on, and little agreement. On the one hand, it appears that boy&#039;s role models are sports stars not professionals. But a contrasting view is that its not a male &#039;problem&#039; but a signal of female success. The number of men has not actually fallen -- its just stagnated. The real success story has been the growth of female post-secondary education.

Looking ahead, I would say we have two challenges. 1) Continue the female success into the hard sciences (where they still lag the males). 2) Reinvigorate male interest in post-secondary participation before this stagnation falls into an actual decline.

Michael Harris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Here’s one little tidbit I found in his summary of a Dutch study: Men used to read more than women, but this has changed. Why?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think if you will run a quick search you will find this isn&#8217;t really a <strong><em>reading</em></strong> issue. In the US about 58% of the college enrollees are females. Men are dropping out at higher rates in high school, fewer of them are enrolling in college, and fewer of those who enroll are graduating.</p>
<p>There is a lot of debate about what is going on, and little agreement. On the one hand, it appears that boy&#8217;s role models are sports stars not professionals. But a contrasting view is that its not a male &#8216;problem&#8217; but a signal of female success. The number of men has not actually fallen &#8212; its just stagnated. The real success story has been the growth of female post-secondary education.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, I would say we have two challenges. 1) Continue the female success into the hard sciences (where they still lag the males). 2) Reinvigorate male interest in post-secondary participation before this stagnation falls into an actual decline.</p>
<p>Michael Harris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephemeral, all too ephemeral; Or, does anybody remember what Russell Jacoby wrote yesterday? &#171; Read, Write, Now</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-705908</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephemeral, all too ephemeral; Or, does anybody remember what Russell Jacoby wrote yesterday? &#171; Read, Write, Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/02/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/#comment-705908</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogging, blogs, Books, intellectuals, internet, public intellectuals, Russell Jacoby, writing  David Rothman over at Teleread announced today that I’ll be blogging for them on a semi-regular basis. As I’ve indicated on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogging, blogs, Books, intellectuals, internet, public intellectuals, Russell Jacoby, writing  David Rothman over at Teleread announced today that I’ll be blogging for them on a semi-regular basis. As I’ve indicated on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Some Jobsian vindication i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-705862</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Some Jobsian vindication i drank the kool-aid: clutching my dixie cup of apple goodness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/2008/02/02/why-steve-jobs-isnt-entirely-wrong-about-the-woes-of-books/#comment-705862</guid>
		<description>[...] Some Jobsian vindication Posted in February 2nd, 2008 Tags: reading  by Dizzle in Dear Leader Why Steve Jobs isn’t entirely wrong about the woes of books [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some Jobsian vindication Posted in February 2nd, 2008 Tags: reading  by Dizzle in Dear Leader Why Steve Jobs isn’t entirely wrong about the woes of books [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 317/341 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 08:23:57 -->
