<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;A Cookbook of One&#8217;s Own From the Internet&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2007/11/12/a-cookbook-of-ones-own-from-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-cookbook-of-ones-own-from-the-internet/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zora</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-cookbook-of-ones-own-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-619225</link>
		<dc:creator>Zora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7593#comment-619225</guid>
		<description>I copy online recipes, paste them into Open Office, edit them, and store them in my RECIPES file folder, on my home computer. Takes a little time, but I don&#039;t have to worry about storage space. If I&#039;m planning to use a recipe (rather than just contemplate using it some day) I&#039;ll print it out. I keep a binder full of printouts on the kitchen counter. If a recipe doesn&#039;t work, I throw away the printout and delete the recipe from the hard drive. Occasionally I edit the binder and remove recipes I haven&#039;t used in a while. 

Why the heck would I want to pay someone to do this for me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I copy online recipes, paste them into Open Office, edit them, and store them in my RECIPES file folder, on my home computer. Takes a little time, but I don&#8217;t have to worry about storage space. If I&#8217;m planning to use a recipe (rather than just contemplate using it some day) I&#8217;ll print it out. I keep a binder full of printouts on the kitchen counter. If a recipe doesn&#8217;t work, I throw away the printout and delete the recipe from the hard drive. Occasionally I edit the binder and remove recipes I haven&#8217;t used in a while. </p>
<p>Why the heck would I want to pay someone to do this for me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Jurd</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-cookbook-of-ones-own-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-618284</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Jurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7593#comment-618284</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not much of a cook, mainly due to lack of time rather than lack of interest.  However, looking at my recipes I am not sure how an Ebook reader would stand up to the sort of treatment my paper recipes get!  Most are covered with generous samples of whatever I was cooking.  Perhaps a special &quot;kitchen model&quot; with a washable plastic cover?  For the price being charged by CN I would suggest franco buys a cheap scanner and scans all those clippings (plus the personal notes) and makes a truly personal E-cookbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not much of a cook, mainly due to lack of time rather than lack of interest.  However, looking at my recipes I am not sure how an Ebook reader would stand up to the sort of treatment my paper recipes get!  Most are covered with generous samples of whatever I was cooking.  Perhaps a special &#8220;kitchen model&#8221; with a washable plastic cover?  For the price being charged by CN I would suggest franco buys a cheap scanner and scans all those clippings (plus the personal notes) and makes a truly personal E-cookbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Monks</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-cookbook-of-ones-own-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-617913</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Monks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7593#comment-617913</guid>
		<description>Not ebook related but I&#039;m a fan of http://ifoods.blogspot.com/ especially the video tutorials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not ebook related but I&#8217;m a fan of <a href="http://ifoods.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ifoods.blogspot.com/</a> especially the video tutorials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franko</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-cookbook-of-ones-own-from-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-617843</link>
		<dc:creator>franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7593#comment-617843</guid>
		<description>funny you should post about this: i was just looking at the tastebook site last week.

i love to cook, and i have subscriptions to sunset and gourmet to fuel my cooking jones. i have been cutting out recipes that we have used and liked from these mags for years now. for awhile i was putting them into a binder, but at two magazines a month plus X-number of recipes saved per magazine means that the recipes come in faster than i find time to snip &amp; organize them that way.

i heard about the tastebook site, and since i am a subscriber of one of the magazines conde nast owns (gourmet), i figured maybe i could copy &#039;n&#039; paste the remaining ones in my stacks from sunset magazine&#039;s site into tastebook, and make a set of books that way. my problem with tastebook comes in at the price, i guess: i have so many recipes i&#039;d need to make several books (at $35 a pop), and their 100-recipe per book limit really puts me off. so i&#039;m back to square one. not sure an electronic version would work in a kitchen, but i&#039;d be willing to try. it&#039;s certainly a more flexible option, since an electronic one would allow growth and reorganizing as needed. but like i say, i&#039;m willing to try it, that&#039;s for sure. i&#039;m tired of my stack of magazines and clippings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny you should post about this: i was just looking at the tastebook site last week.</p>
<p>i love to cook, and i have subscriptions to sunset and gourmet to fuel my cooking jones. i have been cutting out recipes that we have used and liked from these mags for years now. for awhile i was putting them into a binder, but at two magazines a month plus X-number of recipes saved per magazine means that the recipes come in faster than i find time to snip &amp; organize them that way.</p>
<p>i heard about the tastebook site, and since i am a subscriber of one of the magazines conde nast owns (gourmet), i figured maybe i could copy &#8216;n&#8217; paste the remaining ones in my stacks from sunset magazine&#8217;s site into tastebook, and make a set of books that way. my problem with tastebook comes in at the price, i guess: i have so many recipes i&#8217;d need to make several books (at $35 a pop), and their 100-recipe per book limit really puts me off. so i&#8217;m back to square one. not sure an electronic version would work in a kitchen, but i&#8217;d be willing to try. it&#8217;s certainly a more flexible option, since an electronic one would allow growth and reorganizing as needed. but like i say, i&#8217;m willing to try it, that&#8217;s for sure. i&#8217;m tired of my stack of magazines and clippings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 336/362 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-14 22:14:21 -->
