<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The $399 OLPC laptop deal: Who should go ahead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2007/09/27/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-549127</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 16:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7162#comment-549127</guid>
		<description>Douglas K Beagley re OLPC/forms: I&#039;d urge you to write publishers and keep speaking up here. We&#039;re read by some good people at major publishers. Ideally they&#039;ll get the message and at least experiment with nonDRMed .epub---even before the DRMed version is ready. As for DRM, my preference is none. But if they&#039;re gonna do it, they&#039;d better work out standards via the IDPF or it&#039;s just the Tower of eBabel all over again. Thanks. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas K Beagley re OLPC/forms: I&#8217;d urge you to write publishers and keep speaking up here. We&#8217;re read by some good people at major publishers. Ideally they&#8217;ll get the message and at least experiment with nonDRMed .epub&#8212;even before the DRMed version is ready. As for DRM, my preference is none. But if they&#8217;re gonna do it, they&#8217;d better work out standards via the IDPF or it&#8217;s just the Tower of eBabel all over again. Thanks. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pond</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-549065</link>
		<dc:creator>pond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7162#comment-549065</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in too, if I can swing the $$ come early November.

As an anti-DRM bigot, I&#039;ve no problem with lack of support for same. And the XO performs as a MID or UMPC or PDA as well.

I do have concerns about how &#039;finished&#039; the software/hardware is. And the &#039;limited-time availability&#039; also troubles me. Usually I let a &#039;hot new gadget&#039; I&#039;m interested in hit the streets, and see what the first-users say about it. Then I might wait for an update to the software to come along.

Not 100% as you can see...maybe 85-90%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in too, if I can swing the $$ come early November.</p>
<p>As an anti-DRM bigot, I&#8217;ve no problem with lack of support for same. And the XO performs as a MID or UMPC or PDA as well.</p>
<p>I do have concerns about how &#8216;finished&#8217; the software/hardware is. And the &#8216;limited-time availability&#8217; also troubles me. Usually I let a &#8216;hot new gadget&#8217; I&#8217;m interested in hit the streets, and see what the first-users say about it. Then I might wait for an update to the software to come along.</p>
<p>Not 100% as you can see&#8230;maybe 85-90%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas K Beagley</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-548987</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas K Beagley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7162#comment-548987</guid>
		<description>I will be among those pounding the servers as soon as these go on sale. This is a dream machine for me, basically. I want a laptop I can toss around. I love everything about the OLPC... the swivel-E-Reading solution is dreamy, the battery life is dreamy, and the fact that I can write on it clinches the deal. It is like the Sony Reader + awesomness. 

So, I&#039;m an acknowledged fan-boy.

The inability to run a closed, commercial format (Mobipocket) is par for the course. I love this blog, but I really don&#039;t understand anyone&#039;s support for commercial formats. Realistically, where will Mobipocket be twenty years from now? Pfah! I store my permanent eBooks in txt... and only convert them to RTF or whatever my display device can handle later.

-d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be among those pounding the servers as soon as these go on sale. This is a dream machine for me, basically. I want a laptop I can toss around. I love everything about the OLPC&#8230; the swivel-E-Reading solution is dreamy, the battery life is dreamy, and the fact that I can write on it clinches the deal. It is like the Sony Reader + awesomness. </p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m an acknowledged fan-boy.</p>
<p>The inability to run a closed, commercial format (Mobipocket) is par for the course. I love this blog, but I really don&#8217;t understand anyone&#8217;s support for commercial formats. Realistically, where will Mobipocket be twenty years from now? Pfah! I store my permanent eBooks in txt&#8230; and only convert them to RTF or whatever my display device can handle later.</p>
<p>-d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanna</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-548246</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7162#comment-548246</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m out. The machine really intrigues me, but I just bought a Macbook that isn&#039;t much heavier to tote around, and it continues to baffle me why these guys are SO reluctant to sell it in the developed world. They could make a TON of money off these if they put them in Walmarts or something, and tat money could be used to fund the project. Why the commercial bias? I don&#039;t know. But the attitude of it all bugs me and leads me to believe the support for these will be sketchy. I may keep me eye on developments with the ASUS EEE though. It is is reasonably light weight (say, under 2 pounds) and battery-efficient, I may get one as a spare to take to work with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m out. The machine really intrigues me, but I just bought a Macbook that isn&#8217;t much heavier to tote around, and it continues to baffle me why these guys are SO reluctant to sell it in the developed world. They could make a TON of money off these if they put them in Walmarts or something, and tat money could be used to fund the project. Why the commercial bias? I don&#8217;t know. But the attitude of it all bugs me and leads me to believe the support for these will be sketchy. I may keep me eye on developments with the ASUS EEE though. It is is reasonably light weight (say, under 2 pounds) and battery-efficient, I may get one as a spare to take to work with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerebus</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-547780</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerebus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7162#comment-547780</guid>
		<description>Definitely going to try, assuming I can get an order in.  $400 is chump change--I spent as much on my N800 and use it daily.  FBreader should port nicely, and with Squeak I can do so many other things.  It&#039;s as close to a Kay&#039;s Dynabook as we&#039;ve ever gotten (understandable, since he&#039;s been so involved in the project).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely going to try, assuming I can get an order in.  $400 is chump change&#8211;I spent as much on my N800 and use it daily.  FBreader should port nicely, and with Squeak I can do so many other things.  It&#8217;s as close to a Kay&#8217;s Dynabook as we&#8217;ve ever gotten (understandable, since he&#8217;s been so involved in the project).</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Novak</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/drm/the-399-olpc-laptop-deal-who-should-take-advantage-of-it/comment-page-1/#comment-547682</link>
		<dc:creator>John Novak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=7162#comment-547682</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waffling a bit on this, but odds are I will go for it. As an e-book device, I&#039;m not sure it really works; three pounds is on the hefty side. And as a general-purpose computer, it&#039;s kinda underpowered. However, I&#039;m interested in the screen technology, and actually getting my hands on a device to see how it feels and behaves. If you add in the philanthropic aspect, $400 is (barely) worth it for me.

Re Mobi, I can&#039;t add any definitive information; but isn&#039;t the reader on the iRex Java-based? If so, I would think it possible in principle to port it to this device... depends on how easily extendible the system is. The OLPC pages say &quot;We will also provide some support Java and Flash&quot; [sic], for whatever that is worth.

--John N.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waffling a bit on this, but odds are I will go for it. As an e-book device, I&#8217;m not sure it really works; three pounds is on the hefty side. And as a general-purpose computer, it&#8217;s kinda underpowered. However, I&#8217;m interested in the screen technology, and actually getting my hands on a device to see how it feels and behaves. If you add in the philanthropic aspect, $400 is (barely) worth it for me.</p>
<p>Re Mobi, I can&#8217;t add any definitive information; but isn&#8217;t the reader on the iRex Java-based? If so, I would think it possible in principle to port it to this device&#8230; depends on how easily extendible the system is. The OLPC pages say &#8220;We will also provide some support Java and Flash&#8221; [sic], for whatever that is worth.</p>
<p>&#8211;John N.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 374/400 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 07:11:09 -->
