<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Reader hardware demoed at London Book Fair: Sony and IDPF beware!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2007/04/18/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Brubaker</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-340229</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Brubaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-340229</guid>
		<description>Ellen.

Thank you for the questions!  I too looked at the TabletKiosk but found out that the screen wouldn&#039;t rotate... so I went with the Samsung Q1.  I&#039;m currently using MS Reader, Word 2003, and the Mobipocket reader.  The screen will only rotate at it&#039;s lowest resolution.  At that resolution the icons and text  are large and easily accessed.  The resolution doesn&#039;t affect the reading experience.  The Microsoft Reader allows for changes in font size... but I seldom use the feature.  Word 2003 has a nice &quot;reading&quot; view which is ideal for .doc, .rtf, .txt, htm, etc.  I haven&#039;t used mobipocket as much but I am happy with it as well.  

You can change the screen resolutions only when in &quot;landscape&quot; orientation.  However, the text and icon sizes do change accordingly.  I should also say that I have had no issues with the built in Wifi... I don&#039;t know it&#039;s range but it has always worked well when I have needed to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellen.</p>
<p>Thank you for the questions!  I too looked at the TabletKiosk but found out that the screen wouldn&#8217;t rotate&#8230; so I went with the Samsung Q1.  I&#8217;m currently using MS Reader, Word 2003, and the Mobipocket reader.  The screen will only rotate at it&#8217;s lowest resolution.  At that resolution the icons and text  are large and easily accessed.  The resolution doesn&#8217;t affect the reading experience.  The Microsoft Reader allows for changes in font size&#8230; but I seldom use the feature.  Word 2003 has a nice &#8220;reading&#8221; view which is ideal for .doc, .rtf, .txt, htm, etc.  I haven&#8217;t used mobipocket as much but I am happy with it as well.  </p>
<p>You can change the screen resolutions only when in &#8220;landscape&#8221; orientation.  However, the text and icon sizes do change accordingly.  I should also say that I have had no issues with the built in Wifi&#8230; I don&#8217;t know it&#8217;s range but it has always worked well when I have needed to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Hage</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-329676</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Hage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-329676</guid>
		<description>Don,

I am glad that you are happy with your UMPC.  I think that I zigged when I should&#039;ve zagged.  I started to get the Samsung, but ended up getting the Tablet Kiosk.  So could you please list the reading software that you have and if they expand to fit the full screen?  Are the icons on the desktop and menu text big enough to see without using the accessibility application?  
I haven&#039;t decided against getting an UMPC, but before I do I want a review/critique from a person who uses it to read ebooks.  Thanks!

Ellen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>I am glad that you are happy with your UMPC.  I think that I zigged when I should&#8217;ve zagged.  I started to get the Samsung, but ended up getting the Tablet Kiosk.  So could you please list the reading software that you have and if they expand to fit the full screen?  Are the icons on the desktop and menu text big enough to see without using the accessibility application?<br />
I haven&#8217;t decided against getting an UMPC, but before I do I want a review/critique from a person who uses it to read ebooks.  Thanks!</p>
<p>Ellen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Carnell</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-329203</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Carnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-329203</guid>
		<description>&quot;According to publishers who have seen the player, the reader is a step up from the Sony Reader which was introduced last year. The screen quality is reportedly as sharp as Sony, but the Amazon device has better functionality,&quot;

Interesting -- I wonder what the improved functionality is? If this device is as good as the Sony Reader but supports the Mobipocket features like annotating and searching, then I&#039;d pay $400.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;According to publishers who have seen the player, the reader is a step up from the Sony Reader which was introduced last year. The screen quality is reportedly as sharp as Sony, but the Amazon device has better functionality,&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting &#8212; I wonder what the improved functionality is? If this device is as good as the Sony Reader but supports the Mobipocket features like annotating and searching, then I&#8217;d pay $400.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Brubaker</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-329038</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Brubaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-329038</guid>
		<description>I noticed the reference of a bad experience with a UMPC as an ebook reader.  I never believed it made much sense to read a book on a computer or device, there were just too many draw backs.  But after purchasing an ebookwise device, I was quickly hooked.  Not long after this I decided to purchase a UMPC, the Samsung Q1 and have been using it for 6 months.  I love it!  The hard drive allows me to have my whole book collection in one place.  I am not limited to books in one (or few) formats.  I can use it for audible.com content as well as podcasts.  The only issues I have experienced with the UMPC is boot time (not exactly instant on) and bettery life (I purchased the extended battery so I&#039;m good for 4-5 hours plus the regular battery at 2 hours).  But I find that I&#039;m not usually reading for 4-5 hours in a location where I cannot plug in or recharge.

Perhaps the UMPC ins&#039;t for everyone, but I love mine and have read 50+ full length books on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the reference of a bad experience with a UMPC as an ebook reader.  I never believed it made much sense to read a book on a computer or device, there were just too many draw backs.  But after purchasing an ebookwise device, I was quickly hooked.  Not long after this I decided to purchase a UMPC, the Samsung Q1 and have been using it for 6 months.  I love it!  The hard drive allows me to have my whole book collection in one place.  I am not limited to books in one (or few) formats.  I can use it for audible.com content as well as podcasts.  The only issues I have experienced with the UMPC is boot time (not exactly instant on) and bettery life (I purchased the extended battery so I&#8217;m good for 4-5 hours plus the regular battery at 2 hours).  But I find that I&#8217;m not usually reading for 4-5 hours in a location where I cannot plug in or recharge.</p>
<p>Perhaps the UMPC ins&#8217;t for everyone, but I love mine and have read 50+ full length books on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin C. Tofel</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-328729</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin C. Tofel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-328729</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very interested in hearing the details of Ellen&#039;s issues with a UMPC as an eBook reader. As a Microsoft Tablet PC MVP and UMPC evangelist, I&#039;m admittedly biased, but I&#039;d still like to know what the issues and concerns were, as well as the make and model UMPC. That info will play heavily on the experience. For example, I find that my Samsung Q1 UMPC is a stellar eBook reader, but I&#039;ve used other devices that left me slightly disappointed for one or more reasons, i.e. content, software, usability, etc....

Here are some thoughts from almost a year ago using the Q1 and Microsoft reader: http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/05/ink_entertainme.html Personally, I prefer eReader for my books and Zinio for my magazines; both work fantastic on a 7-inch touchscreen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very interested in hearing the details of Ellen&#8217;s issues with a UMPC as an eBook reader. As a Microsoft Tablet PC MVP and UMPC evangelist, I&#8217;m admittedly biased, but I&#8217;d still like to know what the issues and concerns were, as well as the make and model UMPC. That info will play heavily on the experience. For example, I find that my Samsung Q1 UMPC is a stellar eBook reader, but I&#8217;ve used other devices that left me slightly disappointed for one or more reasons, i.e. content, software, usability, etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>Here are some thoughts from almost a year ago using the Q1 and Microsoft reader: <a href="http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/05/ink_entertainme.html" rel="nofollow">http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2006/05/ink_entertainme.html</a> Personally, I prefer eReader for my books and Zinio for my magazines; both work fantastic on a 7-inch touchscreen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-328594</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-328594</guid>
		<description>Very sorry about your UMPC horrors, Ellen. Yes, as far as I know, the Amazon device will use E Ink. I based my Amazon report on a Publishers Weekly article online without a picture of the machine, and I have no idea what the actual product---as opposed to the prototypes---will look like. Any people out there who&#039;ve beheld the current Amazon machine? As for Mobipocket, I, too, hate the device restriction, but in fairness to Amizon/Mobi, the DRM generally is easier to get going than with the Microsoft reader. The catch is that the DRM can be a disaster for library users using certain machines such as the Cybook.

Thanks,
David

P.S. More details welcome re your UMPC hassles! What was the brand? Samsung?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very sorry about your UMPC horrors, Ellen. Yes, as far as I know, the Amazon device will use E Ink. I based my Amazon report on a Publishers Weekly article online without a picture of the machine, and I have no idea what the actual product&#8212;as opposed to the prototypes&#8212;will look like. Any people out there who&#8217;ve beheld the current Amazon machine? As for Mobipocket, I, too, hate the device restriction, but in fairness to Amizon/Mobi, the DRM generally is easier to get going than with the Microsoft reader. The catch is that the DRM can be a disaster for library users using certain machines such as the Cybook.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
David</p>
<p>P.S. More details welcome re your UMPC hassles! What was the brand? Samsung?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Hage</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-328587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Hage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-328587</guid>
		<description>David,

This is good news.  My UMPC purchase was a disaster.  I hated it.  I found it completely unusable as a reader and sent it back the next day.  An expensive disappointment since I had to pay a 15% restocking fee.  It took me more than a minute to save up for that purchase :(   
I am curious on why there isn&#039;t a picture of the Amazon reader.  Is it e-ink?  I hope not.  I would really prefer a device with backlighting and dictionary capabilities.  I like mobipocket and if they could change the number of devices that can be registered from 3 to like 10 and the ability to deactivate an authorized device, then DRM wouldn&#039;t bother me as much.  I pray they don&#039;t follow the MS reader activation model.    

Ellen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>This is good news.  My UMPC purchase was a disaster.  I hated it.  I found it completely unusable as a reader and sent it back the next day.  An expensive disappointment since I had to pay a 15% restocking fee.  It took me more than a minute to save up for that purchase <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I am curious on why there isn&#8217;t a picture of the Amazon reader.  Is it e-ink?  I hope not.  I would really prefer a device with backlighting and dictionary capabilities.  I like mobipocket and if they could change the number of devices that can be registered from 3 to like 10 and the ability to deactivate an authorized device, then DRM wouldn&#8217;t bother me as much.  I pray they don&#8217;t follow the MS reader activation model.    </p>
<p>Ellen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-328459</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-328459</guid>
		<description>First, I dropped my ebookwise, damaging it permanently. So I&#039;m in the market for buying a highend book reader.  I wish people can stop jabbering about new devices and start selling them :) 

I would lean toward the NAEB, though the Amazon device would be tempting (especially if they were in similar price range). My question last week about whether one should go for a device with DRM or one without it becomes all the more relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I dropped my ebookwise, damaging it permanently. So I&#8217;m in the market for buying a highend book reader.  I wish people can stop jabbering about new devices and start selling them <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I would lean toward the NAEB, though the Amazon device would be tempting (especially if they were in similar price range). My question last week about whether one should go for a device with DRM or one without it becomes all the more relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Tyson</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-328249</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Tyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-328249</guid>
		<description>Only one state away?  Stop complaining.  Gateway pulled out of the country!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only one state away?  Stop complaining.  Gateway pulled out of the country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today&#8217;s Shared Items (Daily Links) &#124; Chris Webb: Publishing, Media, and Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-328039</link>
		<dc:creator>Today&#8217;s Shared Items (Daily Links) &#124; Chris Webb: Publishing, Media, and Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-328039</guid>
		<description>[...] Amazon Reader hardware demoed at London Book Fair: Sony and IDPF beware! (tags: Books Publishing ebooks) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazon Reader hardware demoed at London Book Fair: Sony and IDPF beware! (tags: Books Publishing ebooks) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamas Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-327917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-327917</guid>
		<description>DRM can be implemented on other platforms as well, for example the SONY reader device has Linux inside and it does have DRM.
You are right that Microsoft is building DRM into their Windows platform with Vista... but I don&#039;t think that this would tie Amazon to the Windows platform. They probably have their own DRM solution and they can implement it on Linux or Mac or whatever OS they see as a big enough market.


Another thought:
SONY Reader does support DRM free formats: PDF and RTF.
These formats have some limitations in their current implementation but basically we do have a device on the US market and soon in the UK and Canada that is more or less (less, I would say) is supported and marketed by a big corporation.
so it would be possible to start selling DRM free ebooks.
How comes it&#039;s not happening?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DRM can be implemented on other platforms as well, for example the SONY reader device has Linux inside and it does have DRM.<br />
You are right that Microsoft is building DRM into their Windows platform with Vista&#8230; but I don&#8217;t think that this would tie Amazon to the Windows platform. They probably have their own DRM solution and they can implement it on Linux or Mac or whatever OS they see as a big enough market.</p>
<p>Another thought:<br />
SONY Reader does support DRM free formats: PDF and RTF.<br />
These formats have some limitations in their current implementation but basically we do have a device on the US market and soon in the UK and Canada that is more or less (less, I would say) is supported and marketed by a big corporation.<br />
so it would be possible to start selling DRM free ebooks.<br />
How comes it&#8217;s not happening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-327734</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-327734</guid>
		<description>But, Tamas, does Amazon have an OS to use to inflict e-book forms on the stubborn? If I want to read certain DRMed books, I have no choice but to use Windows. Also, as I understand it, future Microsoft Reader equivalents will be tied in with certain Windows features. Furthermore,  even if you&#039;re right, Microsoft may well take an existing format and use the typical MO of tweaking it just enough to be incompatible. Usual IMHO disclaimer. Thanks for your thoughts! David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, Tamas, does Amazon have an OS to use to inflict e-book forms on the stubborn? If I want to read certain DRMed books, I have no choice but to use Windows. Also, as I understand it, future Microsoft Reader equivalents will be tied in with certain Windows features. Furthermore,  even if you&#8217;re right, Microsoft may well take an existing format and use the typical MO of tweaking it just enough to be incompatible. Usual IMHO disclaimer. Thanks for your thoughts! David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamas Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-327709</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamas Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-327709</guid>
		<description>David, why are you referring to Microsoft?
They do have an ebook format but I doubt that it would be popular.

In my opinion they&#039;ll just wait until someone figures out how to have a successful product and then they&#039;ll copy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, why are you referring to Microsoft?<br />
They do have an ebook format but I doubt that it would be popular.</p>
<p>In my opinion they&#8217;ll just wait until someone figures out how to have a successful product and then they&#8217;ll copy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Biba</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-327698</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Biba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-327698</guid>
		<description>Very exciting news.  A reader with the ability to read Mobipocket would be a real boon.  All my book reading is done on this format on a Palm TX or Nokia e62.  I&#039;d love to have a big screen Mobipocket reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very exciting news.  A reader with the ability to read Mobipocket would be a real boon.  All my book reading is done on this format on a Palm TX or Nokia e62.  I&#8217;d love to have a big screen Mobipocket reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/ebooks/london-buzzing-about-amazon-reader-google-online/comment-page-1/#comment-327668</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=6454#comment-327668</guid>
		<description>Two different PR strategies. Sony hyped its reader 8-10 months before actual release. Amazon has done no PR at all. Maybe they&#039;re not anywhere near ready?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two different PR strategies. Sony hyped its reader 8-10 months before actual release. Amazon has done no PR at all. Maybe they&#8217;re not anywhere near ready?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 553/578 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 05:18:50 -->
