<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aussies to legalize format-shifting? Boon for e-book users if reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2006/05/15/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:44:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intelligent comment spam?</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-58064</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko&#8217;s Weblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Intelligent comment spam?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 12:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4862#comment-58064</guid>
		<description>[...] But today I saw something at the Teleread blog, where I also blog, that could either be serious comments, or spam, and I&#8217;ll be damned if I know which is which. Two guys (or rather: to personas) posting adversarial messages, relevant to the blog entry, and the only thing that connects them is an obvious below-average intelligence, and the fact that in their included URLs they both link to similar looking directories &#8212; or are they link farms? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But today I saw something at the Teleread blog, where I also blog, that could either be serious comments, or spam, and I&#8217;ll be damned if I know which is which. Two guys (or rather: to personas) posting adversarial messages, relevant to the blog entry, and the only thing that connects them is an obvious below-average intelligence, and the fact that in their included URLs they both link to similar looking directories &#8212; or are they link farms? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-58063</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 12:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4862#comment-58063</guid>
		<description>OK, that&#039;s interesting. Loy and Jack share almost the same website; only their subjects differ. Both sites are internet directories, though if my suspicion of spam is founded, both are more likely to be link farms. Half-way intelligent spammers? Stranger things have happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that&#8217;s interesting. Loy and Jack share almost the same website; only their subjects differ. Both sites are internet directories, though if my suspicion of spam is founded, both are more likely to be link farms. Half-way intelligent spammers? Stranger things have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loy</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-58059</link>
		<dc:creator>Loy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 09:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4862#comment-58059</guid>
		<description>Everyone has its own rights in so called democratic country, then why not  the right to pirate. 
Piracy is stealing somebody&#039;s work, but that too is an art. Piracy need a tact and so if one is benefitting out of it, why to even think of banning it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has its own rights in so called democratic country, then why not  the right to pirate.<br />
Piracy is stealing somebody&#8217;s work, but that too is an art. Piracy need a tact and so if one is benefitting out of it, why to even think of banning it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-58012</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 22:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4862#comment-58012</guid>
		<description>In the US, fair use principles have degraded pretty dramatically. Back in the days of vinyl (easily scratched) many people played an album once to record it to tape, then played the tape in their car and at home until the tape was worn out, then made another copy...

Today if you buy a CD, music companies think it is their Congressionally given right to force you to buy a digital copy if you want it on your mp3 player. 

Congress has sided with business over personal users in the interest of &#039;avoiding piracy&#039;. Meanwhile, I can&#039;t transfer my $17 USD Virgin CD to my mp3 player. Virgin, BTW, will never get my money if it can be avoided. That is easy for a CD - and probable for their airline seats, which are a bit more expensive. 

There was a very interesting article about the proposed French law being pro consumer. I agree. 

Piracy is stealing somebody&#039;s work. Greed is making you pay for it for every device you one. 

My two cents - fwiw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the US, fair use principles have degraded pretty dramatically. Back in the days of vinyl (easily scratched) many people played an album once to record it to tape, then played the tape in their car and at home until the tape was worn out, then made another copy&#8230;</p>
<p>Today if you buy a CD, music companies think it is their Congressionally given right to force you to buy a digital copy if you want it on your mp3 player. </p>
<p>Congress has sided with business over personal users in the interest of &#8216;avoiding piracy&#8217;. Meanwhile, I can&#8217;t transfer my $17 USD Virgin CD to my mp3 player. Virgin, BTW, will never get my money if it can be avoided. That is easy for a CD &#8211; and probable for their airline seats, which are a bit more expensive. </p>
<p>There was a very interesting article about the proposed French law being pro consumer. I agree. </p>
<p>Piracy is stealing somebody&#8217;s work. Greed is making you pay for it for every device you one. </p>
<p>My two cents &#8211; fwiw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-57979</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 11:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4862#comment-57979</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that copyright is a natural right. I am not sure I even believe in the existence of natural rights, let alone that they always trump positive rights. As far as I am concerned, the pre-1978 Americans with their utalitarian view of copyright were on the correct track. Copyright is a man-made monopoly that should be lessened or abandoned as soon as its positive stimulus can no longer be taken for granted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that copyright is a natural right. I am not sure I even believe in the existence of natural rights, let alone that they always trump positive rights. As far as I am concerned, the pre-1978 Americans with their utalitarian view of copyright were on the correct track. Copyright is a man-made monopoly that should be lessened or abandoned as soon as its positive stimulus can no longer be taken for granted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/copy-right/aussie-to-legalize-format-shifting-boon-for-e-book-users-if-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-57974</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 08:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4862#comment-57974</guid>
		<description>Bad Idea! Hardly matters even if a law is passed. Piracy is a crime and no rule or law can make it legal. Better not to try it !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad Idea! Hardly matters even if a law is passed. Piracy is a crime and no rule or law can make it legal. Better not to try it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 374/399 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-09 21:17:11 -->
