<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scribbling in the margins: More musings on who&#8217;ll do it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2006/04/20/scribbling-in-the-margins-more-musings-on-wholl-do-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/scribbling-in-the-margins-more-musings-on-wholl-do-it/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/scribbling-in-the-margins-more-musings-on-wholl-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-56116</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4712#comment-56116</guid>
		<description>Hi, Quinn. Thanks for your thoughts. BTW, I myself am especially excited by the possibilities for distance ed where people can&#039;t enjoy face-to-face contact. - David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Quinn. Thanks for your thoughts. BTW, I myself am especially excited by the possibilities for distance ed where people can&#8217;t enjoy face-to-face contact. &#8211; David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quinn Anya Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/scribbling-in-the-margins-more-musings-on-wholl-do-it/comment-page-1/#comment-56115</link>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Anya Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4712#comment-56115</guid>
		<description>Hey now, I didn&#039;t mean there&#039;s &lt;em&gt;no one&lt;/em&gt; annotating books in academia. :) Just that, in my experience, the interaction with books in the &lt;em&gt;classroom&lt;/em&gt; setting is done face-to-face. The digitized (generally pdf) materials we use tend to be created for classroom use. The professor teaches, gives assignments based on that lessons and related readings, and students work (sometimes together) to do those assignments. Guidance and direction are built into the system.

I think the greatest potential for academic annotation comes from self-directed research. In order for a scholar to be successful, classes need to be just a jumping-off point. A minority of the books on our PhD reading list are ever assigned for a class. In order to write any decent paper, you have to go beyond the materials covered face-to-face. Because physical copies of some of these books are hard to come by, electronic versions would really free up the scholar to annotate directly into the text. Furthermore, public notes would be a much more efficient alternative to the &quot;I-disagree-with-what-this-guy-said&quot; genre of papers, where a back-and-forth discussion published in journals can drag on for years.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m in favor of annotatable e-books. I just think there are two things currently preventing it from really taking off: 1) the non-annotatable digital format, and 2) the digitization energies focused towards what materials people need &lt;em&gt;now&lt;/em&gt; in the classroom, without looking ahead to what materials people will rely on &lt;em&gt;later&lt;/em&gt; in their independent research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey now, I didn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;s <em>no one</em> annotating books in academia. <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Just that, in my experience, the interaction with books in the <em>classroom</em> setting is done face-to-face. The digitized (generally pdf) materials we use tend to be created for classroom use. The professor teaches, gives assignments based on that lessons and related readings, and students work (sometimes together) to do those assignments. Guidance and direction are built into the system.</p>
<p>I think the greatest potential for academic annotation comes from self-directed research. In order for a scholar to be successful, classes need to be just a jumping-off point. A minority of the books on our PhD reading list are ever assigned for a class. In order to write any decent paper, you have to go beyond the materials covered face-to-face. Because physical copies of some of these books are hard to come by, electronic versions would really free up the scholar to annotate directly into the text. Furthermore, public notes would be a much more efficient alternative to the &#8220;I-disagree-with-what-this-guy-said&#8221; genre of papers, where a back-and-forth discussion published in journals can drag on for years.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m in favor of annotatable e-books. I just think there are two things currently preventing it from really taking off: 1) the non-annotatable digital format, and 2) the digitization energies focused towards what materials people need <em>now</em> in the classroom, without looking ahead to what materials people will rely on <em>later</em> in their independent research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 302/326 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 03:09:01 -->
