<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why e-book fans should root for the Origami to succeed&#8211;and what it will take</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2006/03/31/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-55040</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 18:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-55040</guid>
		<description>snappy said:
&gt;   I believe an Origami costing more than $1000
&gt;   will fold itself up faster than anything.

i agree.

so then they will drop the price to $950,
to see how many people bite at that price.
and then it&#039;ll be $900.  and then $850...

meanwhile, machines like the nokia770
will become more capable, and their price
will rise, in view of that increased power...

and sooner or later, when their features
merge, the two lines will become one...

and eventually the price of that line will
drop.  (or, more likely, the feature-set
associated with that price will increase,
since once the hardware people have
established a price -- or, to put it more
accurately, discovered the _maximum_
we&#039;re willing to pay -- they stick with it.)

but i&#039;ve seen these transitions play out;
they never happen very fast, or fast at all.

and if the manufacturers conclude that
&quot;there&#039;s no market here&quot;, they often even
opt out, sometimes for a rather long time.

so i think we&#039;re still looking at 2-3 _years_...

let&#039;s hope david can keep up his hype that long.

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snappy said:<br />
&gt;   I believe an Origami costing more than $1000<br />
&gt;   will fold itself up faster than anything.</p>
<p>i agree.</p>
<p>so then they will drop the price to $950,<br />
to see how many people bite at that price.<br />
and then it&#8217;ll be $900.  and then $850&#8230;</p>
<p>meanwhile, machines like the nokia770<br />
will become more capable, and their price<br />
will rise, in view of that increased power&#8230;</p>
<p>and sooner or later, when their features<br />
merge, the two lines will become one&#8230;</p>
<p>and eventually the price of that line will<br />
drop.  (or, more likely, the feature-set<br />
associated with that price will increase,<br />
since once the hardware people have<br />
established a price &#8212; or, to put it more<br />
accurately, discovered the _maximum_<br />
we&#8217;re willing to pay &#8212; they stick with it.)</p>
<p>but i&#8217;ve seen these transitions play out;<br />
they never happen very fast, or fast at all.</p>
<p>and if the manufacturers conclude that<br />
&#8220;there&#8217;s no market here&#8221;, they often even<br />
opt out, sometimes for a rather long time.</p>
<p>so i think we&#8217;re still looking at 2-3 _years_&#8230;</p>
<p>let&#8217;s hope david can keep up his hype that long.</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snappy!</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54990</link>
		<dc:creator>Snappy!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 02:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54990</guid>
		<description>Well, if you put it that way ... ;)

Before Dell revolutionized the PC online businesses, most of the 1st-tier vendors like Compaq (before the merger), HP, Toshiba etc would consider it crazy to let users customize and buy online. It used to be crazy to consider sub $500 desktops or sub $1000 laptops. Today, many models from Dell, HP-Compaq, Gateway, Toshiba etc are in the $700~$900 range. :)

So yes, discussing over it may not change anything directly. And it seem almost ridiculous to expect a $499 Origami and yes, it is as though we are asking them to cannibalize their own business. Only time will tell. 

I believe an Origami costing more than $1000 will fold itself up faster than anything. And they would not even need to cannibalize themselve anymore. Origamis would revert back to just a paper-folding art. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you put it that way &#8230; <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Before Dell revolutionized the PC online businesses, most of the 1st-tier vendors like Compaq (before the merger), HP, Toshiba etc would consider it crazy to let users customize and buy online. It used to be crazy to consider sub $500 desktops or sub $1000 laptops. Today, many models from Dell, HP-Compaq, Gateway, Toshiba etc are in the $700~$900 range. <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So yes, discussing over it may not change anything directly. And it seem almost ridiculous to expect a $499 Origami and yes, it is as though we are asking them to cannibalize their own business. Only time will tell. </p>
<p>I believe an Origami costing more than $1000 will fold itself up faster than anything. And they would not even need to cannibalize themselve anymore. Origamis would revert back to just a paper-folding art. <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54972</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54972</guid>
		<description>you guys are too funny!

you want hardware manufacturers
to cannibalize their own business,
and because you have discussed it
ad infinitum, you now think there&#039;s
an actual possibility that they will.

silly boys...

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys are too funny!</p>
<p>you want hardware manufacturers<br />
to cannibalize their own business,<br />
and because you have discussed it<br />
ad infinitum, you now think there&#8217;s<br />
an actual possibility that they will.</p>
<p>silly boys&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snappy!</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54950</link>
		<dc:creator>Snappy!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 11:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54950</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s two HandheldPCs that had swivel screen mechanism:

1. Intermec 6651
http://www.pencomputing.com/frames/textblock_intermec_6651.html

2. Vadem CLIO
http://www.pinaxgroup.com/products/clio_products_main.htm
http://www.pocketpccity.com/articles/1998/10/1998-10-10-Vadem-Clio-Frist.html

Neither one uses the common screen rotation mechanism. The Intermec&#039;s screen flips backward and lays flat with the keyboard behind, forming a tablet, while the Vadem CLIO has hinge arms on the side of the screen to pivot it forward and then flat onto the keyboard.

I&#039;ve heard rave reviews of the Intermec, but its last incarnation used HandheldPC2000 as its OS and is not upgradeable. That together with a hefty price-tag relegated the device to strictly vertical markets and ultimately its demise.

The Vadem CLIO is slightly larger, and weighs 3lbs. One of its ticket to stardom was its maiden flight to space on a shuttle! When I held one in my hands and used it for a couple of weeks, it became apparent that being earth bound, the 3lbs weight pushed it closer to a underpowered ultra-portable, than being a high-end InstantOn HandheldPC.

I&#039;m surprised when Samsung released its UMPC at ~$1200. I thought they would have more sense like the $899 EO released by TabletKiosk which is still almost twice my $499 sweetspot.

To be honest, my $499 rationale is this: 
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;$499 Origami
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;$200 LCD Monitor
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;$50 Port replication
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;$50 Keyboard + mouse accessories
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;$799 Total price&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

This gives me the maximum flexibility of having a truly portable UltraMobile device that I can still use as a PC on my desk.
Of course, if you have the budget to own a desktop, notebook *and* an Origami, then price would not really be such a big issue would it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s two HandheldPCs that had swivel screen mechanism:</p>
<p>1. Intermec 6651<br />
<a href="http://www.pencomputing.com/frames/textblock_intermec_6651.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pencomputing.com/frames/textblock_intermec_6651.html</a></p>
<p>2. Vadem CLIO<br />
<a href="http://www.pinaxgroup.com/products/clio_products_main.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pinaxgroup.com/products/clio_products_main.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.pocketpccity.com/articles/1998/10/1998-10-10-Vadem-Clio-Frist.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pocketpccity.com/articles/1998/10/1998-10-10-Vadem-Clio-Frist.html</a></p>
<p>Neither one uses the common screen rotation mechanism. The Intermec&#8217;s screen flips backward and lays flat with the keyboard behind, forming a tablet, while the Vadem CLIO has hinge arms on the side of the screen to pivot it forward and then flat onto the keyboard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard rave reviews of the Intermec, but its last incarnation used HandheldPC2000 as its OS and is not upgradeable. That together with a hefty price-tag relegated the device to strictly vertical markets and ultimately its demise.</p>
<p>The Vadem CLIO is slightly larger, and weighs 3lbs. One of its ticket to stardom was its maiden flight to space on a shuttle! When I held one in my hands and used it for a couple of weeks, it became apparent that being earth bound, the 3lbs weight pushed it closer to a underpowered ultra-portable, than being a high-end InstantOn HandheldPC.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised when Samsung released its UMPC at ~$1200. I thought they would have more sense like the $899 EO released by TabletKiosk which is still almost twice my $499 sweetspot.</p>
<p>To be honest, my $499 rationale is this: </p>
<ul>
<li>$499 Origami
</li>
<li>$200 LCD Monitor
</li>
<li>$50 Port replication
</li>
<li>$50 Keyboard + mouse accessories
</li>
<li><b>$799 Total price</b>
</li>
</ul>
<p>This gives me the maximum flexibility of having a truly portable UltraMobile device that I can still use as a PC on my desk.<br />
Of course, if you have the budget to own a desktop, notebook *and* an Origami, then price would not really be such a big issue would it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54934</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 05:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54934</guid>
		<description>BP, let me help out with a photo of the Fujitsu p1510, so people can tell what you&#039;re talking about. I myself wouldn&#039;t use the swivel feature for e-books, but others might. Meanwhile best of luck to all of us in our quests for the perfect e-book gizmo! - David

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.teleread.com/fujitsuP1510.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Fujitsu&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP, let me help out with a photo of the Fujitsu p1510, so people can tell what you&#8217;re talking about. I myself wouldn&#8217;t use the swivel feature for e-books, but others might. Meanwhile best of luck to all of us in our quests for the perfect e-book gizmo! &#8211; David</p>
<p><img src="http://www.teleread.com/fujitsuP1510.jpg" alt="Fujitsu" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luag</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54928</link>
		<dc:creator>luag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 04:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54928</guid>
		<description>umpc doesnt necessarily win then....samsung umpc cost almost 1200 usd :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umpc doesnt necessarily win then&#8230;.samsung umpc cost almost 1200 usd <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bp</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54919</link>
		<dc:creator>bp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 22:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54919</guid>
		<description>Given the factors enumerated in the article-- keyboard, price-- I&#039;m always surprised that there&#039;s not more attention paid to Fujitsu&#039;s p1510, a handtop size tablet pc.  Seems to do everything that umpcs do but with keyboard.  And because the screen swivels around, it seems to be a comfortable medium for reading books.  A last advantage is that since it runs MS Tablet PC edition, one has the full arsenal of tools available on a regular computer but in the palm of one&#039;s hand.  The only con seems to be the price tag-- about $1,400.00-- so UMPCs win, but... 

RE: the HPC I too like the the HPC handhelds-- I especially like instant on/off and long battery life.  And working on a their little keyboards sure beats a thumbpad.  But again the price-- whew!  NEC 900c was about $900.00 when if first came out.  And of course this form factor doesn&#039;t seem to have much support....

So I think the ideal would be a $499 handheld with a good swivel screen (for reading books, and more natural note taking) and either speed up turning on windows xp or using same on/off system of current handhelds.  Any takers or suggestions?

-Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the factors enumerated in the article&#8211; keyboard, price&#8211; I&#8217;m always surprised that there&#8217;s not more attention paid to Fujitsu&#8217;s p1510, a handtop size tablet pc.  Seems to do everything that umpcs do but with keyboard.  And because the screen swivels around, it seems to be a comfortable medium for reading books.  A last advantage is that since it runs MS Tablet PC edition, one has the full arsenal of tools available on a regular computer but in the palm of one&#8217;s hand.  The only con seems to be the price tag&#8211; about $1,400.00&#8211; so UMPCs win, but&#8230; </p>
<p>RE: the HPC I too like the the HPC handhelds&#8211; I especially like instant on/off and long battery life.  And working on a their little keyboards sure beats a thumbpad.  But again the price&#8211; whew!  NEC 900c was about $900.00 when if first came out.  And of course this form factor doesn&#8217;t seem to have much support&#8230;.</p>
<p>So I think the ideal would be a $499 handheld with a good swivel screen (for reading books, and more natural note taking) and either speed up turning on windows xp or using same on/off system of current handhelds.  Any takers or suggestions?</p>
<p>-Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snappy</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54866</link>
		<dc:creator>Snappy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54866</guid>
		<description>Absolutely! Boot time is currently paltry for a &quot;UltraMobile&quot; class of device. Cannot imagine using a handphone that takes more than 1 sec to respond. ;) (For that matter, I would include everyday devices like TVs, the light (or lamp), fan ... seem like about the one machine we really put up with a boot time is the PC!)

Hopefully a device with good enough battery life will provide an even longer suspend time. Suspend currently takes 4~5 secs for my notebook. Hibernation around 30secs (It has 1.25gb ram).

Of course I could use InstantOn anytime. Anytime, you listening, Microsoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely! Boot time is currently paltry for a &#8220;UltraMobile&#8221; class of device. Cannot imagine using a handphone that takes more than 1 sec to respond. <img src='http://www.teleread.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  (For that matter, I would include everyday devices like TVs, the light (or lamp), fan &#8230; seem like about the one machine we really put up with a boot time is the PC!)</p>
<p>Hopefully a device with good enough battery life will provide an even longer suspend time. Suspend currently takes 4~5 secs for my notebook. Hibernation around 30secs (It has 1.25gb ram).</p>
<p>Of course I could use InstantOn anytime. Anytime, you listening, Microsoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/uncategorized/why-e-book-fans-should-root-for-the-origami-to-succeed-and-what-it-will-take/comment-page-1/#comment-54852</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=4581#comment-54852</guid>
		<description>I suggest it needs one more thing: much faster startup and shutdown times. The current boot times for Windows XP are pretty long for a device such as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest it needs one more thing: much faster startup and shutdown times. The current boot times for Windows XP are pretty long for a device such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 451/475 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 14:23:26 -->
