<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Networked Novel: Gestation Periods,  Birth Weights and  the Literary Heartbeat (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2005/11/28/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-85883</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-85883</guid>
		<description>On the economic side, I was trying to look at it from a publishers point of view. Either a) publishers like small books because they are cheaper to produce but sell for relatively similar prices or b) publishers like big books because the additional costs are minimal compared to the additional revenue. 
 
Ultimateyl it depends on the market and publishers and their point of view of what the customer actually wants. And then, we&#039;re back into how-long-is-a-piece-of-string territory.

Any publishers care to comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the economic side, I was trying to look at it from a publishers point of view. Either a) publishers like small books because they are cheaper to produce but sell for relatively similar prices or b) publishers like big books because the additional costs are minimal compared to the additional revenue. </p>
<p>Ultimateyl it depends on the market and publishers and their point of view of what the customer actually wants. And then, we&#8217;re back into how-long-is-a-piece-of-string territory.</p>
<p>Any publishers care to comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idiotprogrammer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ebook Creation Links</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-76392</link>
		<dc:creator>Idiotprogrammer &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ebook Creation Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 20:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-76392</guid>
		<description>[...] Networked Novel (Teleread) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Networked Novel (Teleread) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nagle</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-35061</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-35061</guid>
		<description>Another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_11/007650.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;discussion of booklength and reading habits&lt;/a&gt;. 

Books vs. Movies: Funny, I&#039;m reading Leonard Gardner&#039;s Fat City with the knowledge it was later produced as a movie (so I&#039;m constantly imagining  what it would look like). 

David: Yes, it&#039;s fun to wonder what Melville&#039;s creations would have looked like if he received earlier editorial feedback. Part 2 is probably going to talk about how the editorial process has been evolving (for better or for worse). 

Quinn: Half the book is people sitting at a table, yes, that&#039;s a funny way to put it, but you&#039;re right. (Some filmmakers have made interesting films of static scenes, but it&#039;s tricky. My fave: Richard Linklater&#039;s Tape). 

Bowerbird: Remuneration vs. Payoff. Yes, you&#039;re right that the better artists  seek forms, not income potential.  But available time does constrain  creative decisions. I for one find that I run away from ideas about novels (because of the time commitment involved) and lean toward short stories. If you write an 1000 page novel, and it doesn&#039;t quite take off, you&#039;ve wasted a lot of precious time.  It&#039;s really hard figuring out the right balance between project size and frequency.  There are poets who can publish a poem every day or so. Frankly, I&#039;m jealous.  It&#039;s a little  like blogging.  Those who post frequently may end up gaining more readers, while slower posters drift from the minds of readers (I say, thank god for RSS Readers, for helping me to keep track of the multitude of &quot;great but infrequent&quot; bloggers). 

Branko:  Movies are constrained by budgets, so the success of the realization may depend on what movie company produced it.  On the other hand, the very successful &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.panicstruckpro.com/revelations/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;lowbudget Star Wars Revelations &lt;/a&gt; does offer a counterexample how even an &quot;expensive movie concept&quot; like StarWars could be produced at lower budgets and not look too awful (though this is a special case).  Incidentally, I&#039;m working on a story project based upon a movie favorite.  I&#039;m using the same characters from the film, but providing them with an &quot;interior world&quot; missing from  the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_11/007650.php" rel="nofollow">discussion of booklength and reading habits</a>. </p>
<p>Books vs. Movies: Funny, I&#8217;m reading Leonard Gardner&#8217;s Fat City with the knowledge it was later produced as a movie (so I&#8217;m constantly imagining  what it would look like). </p>
<p>David: Yes, it&#8217;s fun to wonder what Melville&#8217;s creations would have looked like if he received earlier editorial feedback. Part 2 is probably going to talk about how the editorial process has been evolving (for better or for worse). </p>
<p>Quinn: Half the book is people sitting at a table, yes, that&#8217;s a funny way to put it, but you&#8217;re right. (Some filmmakers have made interesting films of static scenes, but it&#8217;s tricky. My fave: Richard Linklater&#8217;s Tape). </p>
<p>Bowerbird: Remuneration vs. Payoff. Yes, you&#8217;re right that the better artists  seek forms, not income potential.  But available time does constrain  creative decisions. I for one find that I run away from ideas about novels (because of the time commitment involved) and lean toward short stories. If you write an 1000 page novel, and it doesn&#8217;t quite take off, you&#8217;ve wasted a lot of precious time.  It&#8217;s really hard figuring out the right balance between project size and frequency.  There are poets who can publish a poem every day or so. Frankly, I&#8217;m jealous.  It&#8217;s a little  like blogging.  Those who post frequently may end up gaining more readers, while slower posters drift from the minds of readers (I say, thank god for RSS Readers, for helping me to keep track of the multitude of &#8220;great but infrequent&#8221; bloggers). </p>
<p>Branko:  Movies are constrained by budgets, so the success of the realization may depend on what movie company produced it.  On the other hand, the very successful <a href="http://www.panicstruckpro.com/revelations/" rel="nofollow">lowbudget Star Wars Revelations </a> does offer a counterexample how even an &#8220;expensive movie concept&#8221; like StarWars could be produced at lower budgets and not look too awful (though this is a special case).  Incidentally, I&#8217;m working on a story project based upon a movie favorite.  I&#8217;m using the same characters from the film, but providing them with an &#8220;interior world&#8221; missing from  the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quinn Anya Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-35059</link>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Anya Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-35059</guid>
		<description>In my experience at least (and I&#039;d assume that there&#039;s a large personal element to this sort of thing) the book is almost always better than the movie, particularly if I&#039;ve read the book first. (All the Roal Dahl and Michael Crichton books come to mind.) I read the book &quot;Les Miserables&quot; after watching the musical many times, and ended up liking the book better there too. The only exception I can think of is &quot;Anne of Green Gables&quot;-- I watched the PBS movie version a million times as a kid, and maybe it was the writing style, but I read the book years later and it didn&#039;t live up to the movie I loved.

As for movies becoming books, I haven&#039;t known any novelizations of great movies that were in and of themselves amazing. One of the great things about a book is that you can easily convey a lot of things that would be awkward or time-consuming in a movie (characters&#039; thoughts, non-essential but revealing scenes that would make a movie drag, but somehow work in a book, etc.) All the novelizations I&#039;ve read have stuck right to the movie. When I was a kid, in the days before portable DVD players and video iPods, they weren&#039;t a bad way to re-&quot;watch&quot; a favorite movie when there wasn&#039;t a TV handy, but I&#039;d have never chosen them on their own merits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience at least (and I&#8217;d assume that there&#8217;s a large personal element to this sort of thing) the book is almost always better than the movie, particularly if I&#8217;ve read the book first. (All the Roal Dahl and Michael Crichton books come to mind.) I read the book &#8220;Les Miserables&#8221; after watching the musical many times, and ended up liking the book better there too. The only exception I can think of is &#8220;Anne of Green Gables&#8221;&#8211; I watched the PBS movie version a million times as a kid, and maybe it was the writing style, but I read the book years later and it didn&#8217;t live up to the movie I loved.</p>
<p>As for movies becoming books, I haven&#8217;t known any novelizations of great movies that were in and of themselves amazing. One of the great things about a book is that you can easily convey a lot of things that would be awkward or time-consuming in a movie (characters&#8217; thoughts, non-essential but revealing scenes that would make a movie drag, but somehow work in a book, etc.) All the novelizations I&#8217;ve read have stuck right to the movie. When I was a kid, in the days before portable DVD players and video iPods, they weren&#8217;t a bad way to re-&#8221;watch&#8221; a favorite movie when there wasn&#8217;t a TV handy, but I&#8217;d have never chosen them on their own merits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-35055</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-35055</guid>
		<description>Re: imagination. Let me play devil&#039;s advocate for a moment. If the book allows you to see everything through your own eyes (as opposed to that of a camera in a film), there is a chance that you appreciate the book of a film you&#039;ve never seen better than the film itself (once you get to see it). Would that happen more often than appreciating the film of a book better than the book itself? 

Can you give examples of where that happened (if that happened)?

Do great films get turned into successful books often?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: imagination. Let me play devil&#8217;s advocate for a moment. If the book allows you to see everything through your own eyes (as opposed to that of a camera in a film), there is a chance that you appreciate the book of a film you&#8217;ve never seen better than the film itself (once you get to see it). Would that happen more often than appreciating the film of a book better than the book itself? </p>
<p>Can you give examples of where that happened (if that happened)?</p>
<p>Do great films get turned into successful books often?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quinn Anya Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-34751</link>
		<dc:creator>Quinn Anya Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-34751</guid>
		<description>Great essay-- and perfect timing considering the &quot;war on text.&quot; You raise a good point with imagination. With all the multimedia out there these days, it seems like imagination is getting pushed more and more to the side; we don&#039;t have to dream anything up anymore, it all gets shown to us. I like my Willy Wonka far better than Johnny Depp or Gene Wilder, thank you very much.

Also, the example of &quot;Brothers Karamazov&quot; strikes me as a perfect one. Classic Russian literature, I think, would suffer greatly in more &quot;modern&quot; media such as film. Half the book tends to be characters sitting at the table, getting into long digressions on philosophy and the like. This would make for dull, dragging movie scenes but when it&#039;s their ideas plus your imagination, words on a page bring you much closer to &quot;being there&quot; than any visual representation could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great essay&#8211; and perfect timing considering the &#8220;war on text.&#8221; You raise a good point with imagination. With all the multimedia out there these days, it seems like imagination is getting pushed more and more to the side; we don&#8217;t have to dream anything up anymore, it all gets shown to us. I like my Willy Wonka far better than Johnny Depp or Gene Wilder, thank you very much.</p>
<p>Also, the example of &#8220;Brothers Karamazov&#8221; strikes me as a perfect one. Classic Russian literature, I think, would suffer greatly in more &#8220;modern&#8221; media such as film. Half the book tends to be characters sitting at the table, getting into long digressions on philosophy and the like. This would make for dull, dragging movie scenes but when it&#8217;s their ideas plus your imagination, words on a page bring you much closer to &#8220;being there&#8221; than any visual representation could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-34744</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-34744</guid>
		<description>robert said:
&gt;   If the remuneration of producing a 200 page book 
&gt;   and a 1000 page book are essentially the same, 
&gt;   what size will contemporary novelists tend to produce?

well, i hope they will produce the novel that is
the exact size needed to convey the content.

the people who are writing for &quot;remuneration&quot;
-- and seeking the &quot;recipe&quot; for best &quot;payoff&quot; --
instead of for their &quot;muse&quot; will all be left behind.

and you can take that to the bank...

-bowerbird

p.s.  your entry was _way_ too long for its content.
i read the whole thing _only_ because i felt i had to
make this comment, and didn&#039;t wanna get tripped up.
but i&#039;ll be skipping &quot;part two&quot;, thank you very much...

p.p.s.  in times past, i&#039;ve read your blog too, robert, but
lately, it seems not to be as compelling as it once was.
perhaps you need to find yourself a new recipe, buddy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>robert said:<br />
&gt;   If the remuneration of producing a 200 page book<br />
&gt;   and a 1000 page book are essentially the same,<br />
&gt;   what size will contemporary novelists tend to produce?</p>
<p>well, i hope they will produce the novel that is<br />
the exact size needed to convey the content.</p>
<p>the people who are writing for &#8220;remuneration&#8221;<br />
&#8211; and seeking the &#8220;recipe&#8221; for best &#8220;payoff&#8221; &#8211;<br />
instead of for their &#8220;muse&#8221; will all be left behind.</p>
<p>and you can take that to the bank&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
<p>p.s.  your entry was _way_ too long for its content.<br />
i read the whole thing _only_ because i felt i had to<br />
make this comment, and didn&#8217;t wanna get tripped up.<br />
but i&#8217;ll be skipping &#8220;part two&#8221;, thank you very much&#8230;</p>
<p>p.p.s.  in times past, i&#8217;ve read your blog too, robert, but<br />
lately, it seems not to be as compelling as it once was.<br />
perhaps you need to find yourself a new recipe, buddy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/robert-nagle/the-networked-novel-gestation-periods-birth-weights-and-the-literary-heartbeat-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-34680</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3905#comment-34680</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait for the next installment, Robert. I&#039;m delighted to see long, thoughtful postings like this--even &quot;in an age where attention spans are lessening.&quot; Oh and by the way, I reread Moby Dick recently and was left wondering, &quot;How would Melville have fared under a modern editor?&quot; I like the book as is. But it&#039;s interesting to ponder the what-ifs, especially as e-books grow in popularity. Happy holidays. David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait for the next installment, Robert. I&#8217;m delighted to see long, thoughtful postings like this&#8211;even &#8220;in an age where attention spans are lessening.&#8221; Oh and by the way, I reread Moby Dick recently and was left wondering, &#8220;How would Melville have fared under a modern editor?&#8221; I like the book as is. But it&#8217;s interesting to ponder the what-ifs, especially as e-books grow in popularity. Happy holidays. David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 412/436 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 13:03:44 -->
