<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A convoluted Mambo: Why open source software needs usability Nazis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teleread.com/2005/09/11/a-convoluted-mambo-why-open-source-software-needs-usability-nazis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-convoluted-mambo-why-open-source-software-needs-usability-nazis/</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothman</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-convoluted-mambo-why-open-source-software-needs-usability-nazis/comment-page-1/#comment-26147</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3565#comment-26147</guid>
		<description>Hi, Branko. I caught up belatedly with your comments above. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

&quot;If you use Mambo/Joomla the way it was intended to be used (big news blocks in the middle, user-contributed contented, &#039;fun&#039; sidebars such as calendars), it is probably one of the user-friendliest things you can get.&quot;

Heck,  there shouldn&#039;t be a trade-off between flexibility and usability.  Just my opinion.  

&quot;That is because &#039;the ability to empathize with the end users&#039; does not lead to code, or code review. Also, usable features do not program themselves; they require somebody who wants to code those. And unless you pay them, volunteer coders have a tendency to produce extra features, instead of making existing features better.&quot;

Oh,  howI agree with you on that! But I still think the political situation influences things. The best coders, not necessarily the people who emphathize the best with end users, probably will be the ones prevailing on most open source projects.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Branko. I caught up belatedly with your comments above. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you use Mambo/Joomla the way it was intended to be used (big news blocks in the middle, user-contributed contented, &#8216;fun&#8217; sidebars such as calendars), it is probably one of the user-friendliest things you can get.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heck,  there shouldn&#8217;t be a trade-off between flexibility and usability.  Just my opinion.  </p>
<p>&#8220;That is because &#8216;the ability to empathize with the end users&#8217; does not lead to code, or code review. Also, usable features do not program themselves; they require somebody who wants to code those. And unless you pay them, volunteer coders have a tendency to produce extra features, instead of making existing features better.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh,  howI agree with you on that! But I still think the political situation influences things. The best coders, not necessarily the people who emphathize the best with end users, probably will be the ones prevailing on most open source projects.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branko Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.teleread.com/net-related-tooks-from-search-engines-to-blogware/a-convoluted-mambo-why-open-source-software-needs-usability-nazis/comment-page-1/#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>Branko Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teleread.org/blog/?p=3565#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>I think I told you this privately: Mambo/Joomla is a nuke that bills itself as a CMS. Although nukes are a special type of CMS, generally a CMS is understood to be more flexible than that.

If you use Mambo/Joomla the way it was intended to be used (big news blocks in the middle, user-contributed contented, &quot;fun&quot; sidebars such as calendars), it is probably one of the user-friendliest things you can get. 

&quot;&lt;i&gt;So often, leadership within open source efforts is based too much on programming ability and not enough on the ability to empathize with the end users.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

That is because &quot;the ability to empathize with the end users&quot; does not lead to code , or code review. Also, usable features do not program themselves; they require somebody who &lt;b&gt;wants&lt;/b&gt; to code those. And unless you pay them, volunteer coders have a tendency to produce extra features, instead of making existing features better.

If you want to break that gridlock, you&#039;ll have to think up a method to do so. The developers themselves have no need for that, because they already have the features they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I told you this privately: Mambo/Joomla is a nuke that bills itself as a CMS. Although nukes are a special type of CMS, generally a CMS is understood to be more flexible than that.</p>
<p>If you use Mambo/Joomla the way it was intended to be used (big news blocks in the middle, user-contributed contented, &#8220;fun&#8221; sidebars such as calendars), it is probably one of the user-friendliest things you can get. </p>
<p>&#8220;<i>So often, leadership within open source efforts is based too much on programming ability and not enough on the ability to empathize with the end users.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>That is because &#8220;the ability to empathize with the end users&#8221; does not lead to code , or code review. Also, usable features do not program themselves; they require somebody who <b>wants</b> to code those. And unless you pay them, volunteer coders have a tendency to produce extra features, instead of making existing features better.</p>
<p>If you want to break that gridlock, you&#8217;ll have to think up a method to do so. The developers themselves have no need for that, because they already have the features they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 299/323 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.teleread.com @ 2012-02-15 10:46:35 -->
